Green v. Lewis
Decision Date | 01 November 1933 |
Citation | 113 Fla. 609,151 So. 270 |
Parties | GREEN et al. v. LEWIS et al. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Rehearing Denied Dec. 5, 1933.
Bill by Doris Robinson Green and another against Rose Robinson Lewis and another, as executrices of and trustees under the last will and testament of John S. Robinson, deceased, and Howard W. Smith, claiming as trustee under the last will and testament of John S. Robinson. From an adverse order plaintiffs appeal.
Reversed and remanded. Appeal from Circuit Court, Duval County; G. C. Gibbs, Judge.
Bedell & Bedell, of Jacksonville, for appellant.
Daniel Boggs & Thompson, of Jacksonville, for appellees.
The appellant filed bill in chancery in which she sought to have declared void a certain clause in her grandfather's last will and testament and also sought to have construed other clauses in the will so that she might be decreed to be entitled to a one-twelfth of the income of the estate of her grandfather from and after the 13th day of November, 1924, at which date her grandmother, a beneficiary under the will and by reason of the death of whom she claims this right, died.
The case presents some interesting questions, and one might write a volume concerning the law applicable to this case. The present writer, however, has neither the time nor inclination to do that, and, therefore, we shall dispose of the necessay questions as directly as is possible.
John S Robinson on the 27th day of April, 1910, executed his last will and testament.
This suit involves only certain parts of that will. Those parts are as follows:
'I give, devise and bequeath all of my estate and effects whatsoever and wheresoever located, both real and personal, to which I may be entitled, or of which I may have the power to dispose at the time of my decease to my wife Lizzette G. Robinson of Jacksonville, Florida, Rose Robinson Lewis of Rixeyville, Virginia, Beulah Robinson Lewis of Smithfield, West Virginia and E. L. Robinson of New Martinsville, West Virginia, co-trustees, upon trust.'
Items I and II are not involved.
Items III, IV, V, and VI are as follows:
The first clause of item VII of the will is pertinent because it shows that the testator is dealing separately with the corpus of the estate on one hand and the income of the estate on the other. The first paragraph of item VII is as follows:
'I direct that after paying the beneficiaries the proportion of the income to which they are entitled each year, that then my said trustees shall invest the remaining fifty per cent less such amount as may be needed for my grand-daughter, Doris L. Robinson, as provided in Article #3 hereof, for the benefit of my estate, and that such investments shall only be made in the following classes of securities, to-wit:...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lewis v. Green
...determined under the trust, her rights to the $3,000 bequest, and her rights to share in the estate as an heir. In Green v. Lewis, 113 Fla. 609, 151 So. 280 (1933), the Florida Supreme Court determined that Doris was entitled to receive one-third of her grandmother's share of the income fro......
-
Green v. Lewis
...So. 901 113 Fla. 609 GREEN et al. v. LEWIS et al. Florida Supreme Court, Division B.March 14, 1934 On rehearing. For former opinion, see 151 So. 270. Appeal Circuit Court, Duval County; Geo. Cooper Gibbs, judge. COUNSEL Bedell & Bedell, of Jacksonville, for appellants. Daniel, Boggs & Thomp......