Green v. State, s. 61465

Decision Date20 April 1981
Docket Number61466,Nos. 61465,s. 61465
Citation158 Ga.App. 321,279 S.E.2d 763
PartiesGREEN v. The STATE. SNEED v. The STATE.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

S. Andrews Seery, Thomasville, for appellant (No. 61465).

Steve Messinger, Thomasville, for appellant (No. 61466).

H. Lamar Cole, Dist. Atty., Dwight May, Dick Shelton, James Thagard, Asst. Dist. Attys., for appellee.

CARLEY, Judge.

Appellants in these companion cases appeal their convictions of burglary.

1. Appellants enumerate as error the denial of their motions for directed verdicts of acquittal. On appeal they argue, in effect, that the state failed to introduce evidence of their "intent to commit a felony or theft" within the entered building, an element of the crime of burglary as defined in Code Ann. § 26-1601. We conclude that, in this case, there was sufficient evidentiary support for a finding of the requisite intent. "(T)he presence of valuables inside the premises can support an inference of intent to steal (Cit.), particularly when no other motive is apparent. (Cit.) The evidence supported the verdict." Parrish v. State, 141 Ga.App. 631(1), 234 S.E.2d 174 (1977).

2. After the charge, the jury asked the trial court "to clarify the definition of Trespass and Burglary." While appellants do not contend that the recharge on this matter was erroneous in its content, they urge that as phrased it was argumentative and emphasized the state's case against them. We have carefully studied the transcript and find that the recharge was responsive to the jury's question and was not erroneous for any reasons urged on appeal. Warren v. State, 44 Ga.App. 235, 237, 161 S.E. 161 (1931). See also Brown v. State, 142 Ga.App. 247, 235 S.E.2d 671 (1977).

Judgments affirmed.

DEEN, P. J., and BANKE, J., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Brown v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • October 4, 1994
    ...can support an inference of intent to steal (cit.), particularly when no other motive is apparent. (Cit.)" ' Green v. State, 158 Ga.App. 321(1) (279 SE2d 763) (1981)." Miller v. State, 208 Ga.App. 547(1), 430 S.E.2d 873. The evidence is sufficient to authorize the jury's verdict that defend......
  • McNair v. State, A89A0013
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • February 21, 1989
    ...is apparent. (Cit.) The evidence supported the verdict.' Parrish v. State, 141 Ga.App. 631(1), (234 SE2d 174) (1977)." Green v. State, 158 Ga.App. 321(1), 279 S.E.2d 763. See also Fennell v. State, 159 Ga.App. 194, 195, 283 S.E.2d 72; Loury v. State, 147 Ga.App. 152(1), 248 S.E.2d 291; and ......
  • Moon v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • April 9, 1993
    ...is apparent. [Cit.] The evidence supported the verdict." Parrish v. State, 141 Ga.App. 631(1) (234 SE2d 174) (1977).' Green v. State, 158 Ga.App. 321(1) (279 SE2d 763). See also Fennell v. State, 159 Ga.App. 194, 195 (283 SE2d 72); Loury v. State, 147 Ga.App. 152(1) (248 SE2d 291); and Eale......
  • Miller v. State, A93A0087
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • April 28, 1993
    ...can support an inference of intent to steal (cit.), particularly when no other motive is apparent. (Cit.)' " Green v. State, 158 Ga.App. 321(1), 279 S.E.2d 763 (1981). A rational trier of fact could reasonably have found from the evidence adduced below proof of appellant's guilt beyond a re......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT