Green v. State
| Decision Date | 01 August 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. 1179S314,1179S314 |
| Citation | 451 N.E.2d 638 |
| Parties | Thomas Abraham GREEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee. |
| Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
C. Thomas Cone, Greenfield, for appellant.
Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen., Gordon R. Medlicott, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, for appellee.
Appellant was convicted of rape of a fifteen year old girl, and confinement of a sixteen year old boy. These and another conviction were affirmed on appeal, however, the court below imposed consecutive sentences of twenty years each on the rape and confinement convictions, and this Court remanded to the trial court for a more specific and individualized statement of reasons for the imposition of consecutive sentences. Green v. State, (1981) Ind., 421 N.E.2d 635; Green v. State, (1981) Ind., 424 N.E.2d 1014.
Upon remand, the trial judge stated his reasons within the criteria set forth in the sentencing statute. Ind.Code Sec. 35-50-1A-7(c) 2, 3, 4, and 6. Appellant was forty years old at the time of sentencing. The statement now sets out misdemeanor convictions of disorderly conduct, assault and battery, and failure to stop after an accident and an arrest for assault. These events occurred fifteen, eight, seven and one-half and two years before the present offenses. These adult matters were preceded by serious delinquent acts resulting in commitments to the Ohio Boys School and the Ohio State Reformatory. Appellant contends that none of these were recent, none were felonies, the penalties on each were served in full, and they therefore cannot serve as an aggravating circumstance. We do not agree. The purpose of examining an individual's history of criminal activity is to determine the character of the offender. These prior skirmishes with the law fairly reflect persistent aspects of his character.
The statement of reasons also includes specific reference to the continuous nature of events comprising appellant's history of criminal activity, the use of a deadly weapon to threaten bodily harm, and the age of the victims. Contrary to appellant's assertions, these reasons are supported in the record and fairly reflect appellant's character and the character of the offenses underlying these most recent convictions.
The trial court ended the statement of reasons by further finding that there were no facts in evidence which would fall within the mitigating categories of the statute. Appellant complains in this appeal, that this finding is contrary to...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Lowery v. State
...is discretionary and since the record clearly supports the judge's findings, we do not find he abused his discretion. Green v. State, (1983) Ind., 451 N.E.2d 638. An examination of the entire record, pursuant to our responsibility to review the imposition of the death penalty, clearly suppo......
-
Sweet v. State
...sentencing, we must be told of its reasons for imposing the sentence. Green v. State (1981), Ind., 424 N.E.2d 1014, on remand (1983), Ind., 451 N.E.2d 638. This statement of reasons must contain the following three elements: (1) It must identify all significant mitigating and aggravating ci......
-
Simmons v. State
...factors. Under the circumstances, where our standard of review is whether the trial court abused its discretion, Green v. State, (1983) Ind., 451 N.E.2d 638, 639; Bergdorff v. State, (1980) Ind.App., 405 N.E.2d 550, we find no error The trial court is in all things affirmed. CONOVER, P.J., ......
-
Jones v. State
...sentencing, we must be told of its reasons for imposing the sentence. Green v. State, (1981) Ind., 424 N.E.2d 1014, on remand (1983) Ind., 451 N.E.2d 638. This statement of reasons must contain the following three elements: (1) It must identify all significant mitigating and aggravating cir......