Green v. Tarr
Decision Date | 22 November 1910 |
Parties | GREEN v. TARR. SAME v. NILES et al. |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Exceptions from Superior Court, Essex County; Wm. B. Stevens, Judge.
Actions by John E. Green against Fred L. Tarr and against William H. Niles and others. Verdict for defendants, and plaintiff excepts. Exceptions overruled.
A. B. Tolman, J. H. Sisk, W. E. Sisk, and R. L. Sisk, for plaintiff.
Matthews, Thompson & Spring and Wm. H. Niles, for defendants.
These are two actions, one against the plaintiff's employer and the other against the owners of the building where the plaintiff worked, to recover for an injury received by him while riding upon an elevator. The elevator was for the carriage of freight from the level of the street to the fifth floor and the intervening floors of the building. It was designed to take a load of 3,000 lbs. in addition to its own weight. Its rate of speed was from 45 to 50 feet per minute. The platform ws about 5 feet square. All these facts were put in evidence by the plaintiff and were undisputed. There was testimony that signs were posted, bearing these words: There was evidence tending to show that, when the elevator was not otherwise in use, employés often rode upon it without objection. At each floor there was a hatchway or plank floor in two parts, so arranged that it was opened and shut automatically by the elevator as it passed up and down; each part being lifted and rolled back upon a track under the floor by the elevator as it came in contact with it, and then returned to its place by the force of gravity after the elevator had gone by. At the edge of the platform, on the two sides of the elevator where the tracks for the hatches were located, there was a strip of wood about 2 1/2 inches wide and 2 1/2 inches high, bolted through the floor, to prevent anything carried on the elevator from going over the edge of the platform.
The plaintiff was about 20 years of age. He had come down the stairs from the fifth story on an errand, and was going back, when he saw the elevator standing at the first floor, got into it, and invited Mrs. Nicholson, an employé whom he saw coming to her work late, to ride up with him. When both were on the elevator, he started it. As he was passing the fourth floor the heel of his foot was over the edge of the platform outside of the strip of wood 2 1/2 inches high, bolted through the floor of the platform, and it caught upon some part of the surrounding structure and was injured. He and Mrs. Nicholson were the only persons who saw the accident.
When asked in his direct examination to state what happened, the plaintiff said: To the question; ‘What happened to you when the jolt came?’ he happened: ‘Well, the next I remember, my foot was caught.’ He also said: He testified that he had ridden on the elevator a great many times during the months that he has worked there before the accident, and said that when he had ridden on it ‘it shook violently, but not as violently as it did the day I was hurt.’ Answering another question he said, ‘I meant that it shook strongly, as near as I can remember, all the time I was there.’ To the question; ‘Now, then, what else did it do besides shaking strongly during the time you were there, or any portion of the time?’ he replied:
Mrs. Nicholson, called by the plaintiff, testified in part as follows:
In cross-examination she testified that Green was telling her something that happened to him with a lot of other boys in the Lynn Theater, when a policeman on duty called out for them to move on, or...
To continue reading
Request your trial