Greene v. Greene, 88-03495
| Decision Date | 01 September 1989 |
| Docket Number | No. 88-03495,88-03495 |
| Citation | 547 So.2d 1302,14 Fla. L. Weekly 2059 |
| Parties | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2059 Jack M. GREENE, Appellant, v. Barbara D. GREENE, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Jack M. Greene, pro se.
Katherine Jennison and Frederique B. Boire, of Reed & Boire, P.A., Tampa, for appellee.
This appeal arises from the denial of the husband's pro se petition for modification of a September 14, 1984, final judgment of dissolution of marriage.
The final judgment of dissolution incorporated the husband's agreement to pay $750 per month as permanent periodic alimony to the wife. At the time of the divorce, the parties had been married 29 years and the husband was employed earning $43,000 per year. In September 1986 the husband voluntarily retired and began receiving a pension of $937 per month. He then became reemployed in a similar job at an annual salary of $30,000 per year. In September 1987 he was involuntarily terminated from his new employment due to market conditions in the steel industry. He is now 58 years of age and asserts that he has sought new employment without success. The wife has been employed since 1984 and currently earns $6.40 per hour as a library assistant. The husband has remarried. Based on these facts, the appellant brought a petition for modification seeking a termination of his alimony obligation.
After a nonjury trial, the lower court entered a final order denying the petition. In that order the trial judge found that because appellant voluntarily retired from his employment with Florida Steel in 1986, the $30,000 per year salary which he earned at Suncoast Steel at the time of his termination should be imputed to him now. The apparent rationale for this ruling is that if appellant had not voluntarily retired from Florida Steel, then he would not have been in the position of being fired by Suncoast Steel. We can find no basis in law for such a conclusion and reverse.
A court may impute income to a party who has no income or earnings less than are available to him based upon a showing that the party has the capability to earn more by the use of his best efforts. Desilets v. Desilets, 377 So.2d 761 (Fla.2d DCA 1979). This determination of earning capacity versus actual earnings assumes that the party to which income is to be imputed has chosen to earn less and has the ability to remedy the situation. Likewise, a party may not use voluntary retirement not mandated by circumstances beyond his control as a change of...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Wiedman v. Wiedman
...See Chastain v. Chastain, 73 So.2d 66 (Fla.1954); Landry v. Landry, 436 So.2d 353 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).3 Compare Greene v. Greene, 547 So.2d 1302 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). See Desilets v. Desilets, 377 So.2d 761 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Fried v. Fried, 375 So.2d 46 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Bradley v. Bradle......
-
Deegan v. Deegan
...voluntary change. See, e.g., Shaughnessy v. Shaughnessy, 164 Ariz. 449, 793 P.2d 1116, 1118 (Ariz.Ct.App.1990); Greene v. Greene, 547 So.2d 1302, 1303 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1989); Servies v. Servies, 524 So.2d 678, 680 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1988); Ward v. Ward, 502 So.2d 477, 478 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.198......
-
Wendel v. Wendel
...that the parent is not currently using his or her best efforts to obtain employment. Cushman, 585 So.2d at 486; Greene v. Greene, 547 So.2d 1302 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). The trial court's finding that the parent is underemployed must be based on evidence presented at the Here, the trial court's ......
-
Lopez v. Lopez, 92-251
...3d DCA 1991); Ensley v. Ensley, 578 So.2d 497 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); Arce v. Arce, 566 So.2d 1308 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Greene v. Greene, 547 So.2d 1302 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Kernan v. Kernan, 495 So.2d 275 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Mounce v. Mounce, 459 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Shapiro v. Shapir......
-
Alimony and support
...termination may be taken into account as militating against imputation of income to the terminated spouse. [ Greene v. Greene, 547 So. 2d 1302 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989) (income could not be imputed to husband where he was involuntarily terminated from employment; employment applications submitted ......