Greene v. Stadiem

Decision Date02 October 1929
Docket Number209.
Citation149 S.E. 685,197 N.C. 472
PartiesGREENE, Com'r of Court, v. STADIEM et ux.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

Appeal from Superior Court, Lenoir County; Cowper, Special Judge.

Controversy without action between George B. Greene, Commissioner of Court, and H. Stadiem and wife. From the judgment defendants appeal. Reversed, and case dismissed.

Controversy without action, submitted as follows:

"The plaintiff and the defendants, having a question in difference which might be the subject of a civil action agree upon the following statement containing the facts upon which the controversy depends, and present a submission of the same to the court, as provided in Section 626 of the Consolidated Statutes of North Carolina, and do hereby stipulate and agree that G. V. Cowper, Judge of the Superior Court of North Carolina, residing in Kinston, may hear this controversy without action at Chambers in Kinston, and render judgment herein."

From the judgment rendered on the facts agreed, the defendants appeal.

F. E Wallace, of Kinston, for appellants.

Sutton & Greene, of Kinston, for appellee.

STACY C.J.

The court will take judicial notice of the fact that Hon. G. V Cowper is one of the special judges appointed by the Governor under authority of chapter 137, Public Laws 1929. Gross v. Wood, 117 Md. 362, 83 A. 337, Ann. Cas. 1914A, 30, and note; 15 R. C. L. 1106. It is not suggested that he was designated or commissioned by the Governor to hold a regular or special term of the superior court of Lenoir county during the week of May 18, 1929, when the judgment in the instant case was signed, but the contrary has been made to appear by certificate from the clerk of the superior court of said county. Indeed, the judgment on its face purports to have been rendered "at chambers."

It is provided by article 4, § 11, of the State Constitution that every judge of the superior court shall reside in the district for which he is elected, and shall preside in the courts of the different districts successively, but not in the same district oftener than once in four years, etc.; "and the general assembly may by general laws provide for the selection of special or emergency judges to hold the superior courts of any county, or district, when the judge assigned thereto, by reason of sickness, disability, or other cause, is unable to attend and hold said court, and when no other judge is available to hold the same. Such special or emergency judges shall have the power and authority of regular judges of the superior courts, in the courts which they are so appointed to hold."

Pursuant to this provision of the Constitution, the General Assembly of 1929, by general law, chapter 137, authorized the Governor to appoint six special judges of the superior courts for terms beginning July 1, 1929, and ending June 30, 1931, and to issue commissions accordingly.

Section 5 of said act provides: "That such special judges during the time noted in their commissions shall have all the jurisdiction which is now or may...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Pruitt v. Wood
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • December 3, 1930
    ... ... R ... R., 198 N.C. 432, 152 S.E. 38 (dismissed for failure to ... reduce evidence to narrative form); Greene v ... Stadiem, 197 N.C. 472, 149 S.E. 685 (dismissed because ... coram non judice); Schwarberg v. Howard, 197 N.C ... 126, 147 S.E. 741 ... ...
  • Edmundson v. Edmundson
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • November 4, 1942
    ...the General Assembly could not grant power and authority to Special Judges beyond that fixed by the Constitution. Greene v. Stadiem, 197 N.C. 472, 149 S.E. 685. while the power and authority of Special Judges is that of regular judges of the Superior Court, these judicial powers, under the ......
  • State Distributing Corporation v. Travelers Indem. Co.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • June 2, 1944
    ... ... the judgment is without force in law. Ward v ... Agrillo, 194 N.C. 321, 139 S.E. 451; Greene v ... Stadiem, 197 N.C. 472, 149 S.E. 685; Lenoir Drug Co ... v. Town of Lenoir, 160 N.C. 571, 76 S.E. 480; Howard ... v. Queen City Coach ... ...
  • Abernethy v. Burns
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • November 4, 1936
    ...in the municipal court, if, indeed, it were coram non judice, was a nullity, and the judgment rendered therein, void. Greene v. Stadiem, 197 N.C. 472, 149 S.E. 685; State v. Baxter, 208 N.C. 90, 179 S.E. 450. course, we do not say such is the case-only that there is evidence on the record t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT