Greene v. State, 96-362
Decision Date | 08 March 2001 |
Docket Number | 96-362 |
Citation | 37 S.W.3d 579 |
Parties | JACK GORDON GREENE, APPELLANT, VS. STATE OF ARKANSAS, APPELLEE.96-362 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS Opinion Delivered 8 March 2001 PETITION FOR REHEARING DENIED. ROBERT L. BROWN, Associate Justice SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION Appellant petitions for rehearing on the issue of the proffered sentencing and forgiveness statements made by the victim's spouse. This is a reargument, and we deny the petition. Appellant Greene points out, in addition, that he rescinded his waiver of appeal in a communication with his trial attorney on |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Opinion Delivered 8 March 2001
PETITION FOR REHEARING DENIED.
Appellant petitions for rehearing on the issue of the proffered sentencing and forgiveness statements made by the victim's spouse. This is a reargument, and we deny the petition.
Appellant Greene points out, in addition, that he rescinded his waiver of appeal in a communication with his trial attorney on December 2, 1999, and that, subsequently, he asked that the Arkansas Public Defender Commission be substituted as his counsel on appeal. We agree with appellant Greene on this matter and issue this supplemental opinion to acknowledge that the original opinion is in error when it states that the Arkansas Public Defender Commission is representing appellant Greene as part of mandatory review pursuant to State v. Robbins, 339 Ark. 379, 5 S.W.3d 51 (1999).
Corbin, J., not participating.
To continue reading
Request your trial- Kaczmarek v. State
-
Springs v. Hobbs
... ... ' petition is a mixed petition, meaning that some of his claims have been presented to the state courts, while others have not. He argues, in part, that he is actually innocent of capital murder ... , according to the court, much of Matthew's testimony would have been cumulative, and, under Greene v. State, 343 Ark. 526, 37 S.W.3d 579 (2001), any possible testimony related to an appropriate ... ...
-
Anderson v. State
... ... State, 343 Ark. 62, 31 S.W.3d 850 (2000), or closing arguments, Buckley, supra and Greene v. State, 343 Ark. 526, 37 S.W.3d 579 (2001). The issue here is whether prosecutorial misstatements during voir dire concerning the State's burden ... ...
-
State of Tenn. v. HESTER
... ... testimony from defendant's family as to their opinion that the defendant should receive life imprisonment instead of the death penalty); Greene v. State, 343 Ark. 526, 37 S.W.3d 579, 583-86 (2001) (concluding that victim's wife's opinion that the defendant should not receive the death ... ...