Greene v. United States, No. 687
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM |
| Citation | 7 L.Ed.2d 841,82 S.Ct. 852,369 U.S. 403 |
| Docket Number | No. 687 |
| Decision Date | 02 April 1962 |
| Parties | A. Cheney GREENE et al. v. UNITED STATES |
v.
UNITED STATES.
Supreme Court of the United States
Richard E. Moot, for petitioners.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Joseph M. Howard, for the United States.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court with instructions to dismiss the appeal. DiBella v. United States, 369 U.S. 121, 82 S.Ct. 654.
To continue reading
Request your trial
15 practice notes
-
National Association For Advancement of Colored People v. Button, No. 5
...81 S.Ct. 803, 5 L.Ed.2d 807.3 We heard argument in the 1961 Term Page 419 and ordered reargument this Term. 369 U.S. 833, 82 S.Ct. 863, 7 L.Ed.2d 841. Since no cross-petition was filed to review the Supreme Court of Appeals' disposition of Chapter 36, the only issue before us is the constit......
-
Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Committee, No. 6
...1093, 6 L.Ed.2d 240; the case was argued last Term and restored to the calendar for reargument this Term, 369 U.S. 834, 82 S.Ct. 863, 7 L.Ed.2d 841. I. We are here called upon once again to resolve a conflict between individual rights of free speech and association and governmental interest......
-
Wolf v. Weinstein, No. 70
...Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in separate opinions, reversed both orders. We granted certiorari, 369 U.S. 837, 82 S.Ct. 868, 7 L.Ed.2d 841. We decide only the issues presented by the Court of Appeals' reversal of the District Court's order applying § 249 to Weinstein and Fried, a......
-
Townsend v. Sain, No. 8
...1961. Two of the Justices were unable to participate in a decision, and we subsequently ordered it reargued. 369 U.S. 834, 82 S.Ct. 864, 7 L.Ed.2d 841. We now have it before us for decision. The undisputed evidence adduced at the trial-court hearing on the motion to suppress showed the foll......
Request a trial to view additional results
15 cases
-
National Association For Advancement of Colored People v. Button, No. 5
...81 S.Ct. 803, 5 L.Ed.2d 807.3 We heard argument in the 1961 Term Page 419 and ordered reargument this Term. 369 U.S. 833, 82 S.Ct. 863, 7 L.Ed.2d 841. Since no cross-petition was filed to review the Supreme Court of Appeals' disposition of Chapter 36, the only issue before us is the constit......
-
Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Committee, No. 6
...1093, 6 L.Ed.2d 240; the case was argued last Term and restored to the calendar for reargument this Term, 369 U.S. 834, 82 S.Ct. 863, 7 L.Ed.2d 841. I. We are here called upon once again to resolve a conflict between individual rights of free speech and association and governmental interest......
-
Wolf v. Weinstein, No. 70
...Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in separate opinions, reversed both orders. We granted certiorari, 369 U.S. 837, 82 S.Ct. 868, 7 L.Ed.2d 841. We decide only the issues presented by the Court of Appeals' reversal of the District Court's order applying § 249 to Weinstein and Fried, a......
-
Townsend v. Sain, No. 8
...1961. Two of the Justices were unable to participate in a decision, and we subsequently ordered it reargued. 369 U.S. 834, 82 S.Ct. 864, 7 L.Ed.2d 841. We now have it before us for decision. The undisputed evidence adduced at the trial-court hearing on the motion to suppress showed the foll......
Request a trial to view additional results