Greenlee v. Southern Ry. Co.

Decision Date26 May 1898
Citation30 S.E. 115,122 N.C. 977
PartiesGREENLEE v. SOUTHERN RY. CO.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

Appeal from superior court, McDowell county; Green, Judge.

Action by Stephen Greenlee against the Southern Railway Company. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.

A railroad company which fails to have modern coupling devices on its freight cars is guilty of continuing negligence, and is liable for injuries incurred in coupling such cars by hand.

G. F Bason, Chas. Price, and A. B. Andrews, Jr., for appellant.

E. J Justice and John T. Perkins, for appellee.

CLARK J.

In any aspect of this case, the defendant is liable, whether the plaintiff was or was not guilty of contributory negligence for the negligence of the defendant in not having self-couplers, and in sending a man to couple cars at all was a continuing negligence, which existed subsequent to the contributory negligence, if there had been any, of the plaintiff, and was the proximate cause-the causa causans-of the injury. Six years ago, in Mason v. Railroad Co., 111 N.C. 482, at page 487, 16 S.E. 698, at page 699, the court, in considering "whether the defendant company was negligent in failing to provide what is known as the Janney, or some improved coupler which would obviate the necessity under any circumstances of going between the ends of cars in order to fasten one to another," said: "We think that the time has arrived when railroad companies should be required to attach such couplers *** on all passenger cars, *** and the new couplers have now become so cheap, as compared to the value of the lives and limbs of servants and passengers, that it is not unreasonable to require that they provide them on peril of answering for any damage which might have been obviated by their use." While the court declined, on account of the expense, to hold that the same was true at that time as to freight cars, it added: "Doubtless, the day will soon come" when it would be negligence not to attach them to freight as well as passenger cars. Congress so thought, and passed an act (27 Stat. 531) requiring selfcouplers and air brakes to be placed on all cars, freight as well as passenger, by January 1, 1898; and this had been complied with as to "over 60 per cent. of the freight cars," besides nearly all passenger cars, operating in interstate commerce, by that date. In Witsell v. Railway Co., 120 N.C. 557, 27 S.E. 125, the above citation from Mason v. Railroad Co. was approved, and the court held that, while it was not negligent to fail to provide the latest improved appliances, a railroad company was liable for any injury caused by the failure to use approved appliances that are in general use. The railroad companies have of late procured from the interstate commerce commission an extension, till January 1, 1900, of the time by which self-couplers should be placed upon all freight cars used in interstate service; but this was for their accommodation, and did not and could not relieve them from the legal liability incurred for injuries caused by their failure to provide "suitable appliances in general use" where the use of such would have prevented the injury. It only relieved them from the penalty provided in that act. The eleventh annual report (1897) of the interstate commerce commission, issued by authority of the United States government, and based upon the reports of the railroad companies themselves, shows (page 80) that, of railroad employés (leaving out passengers altogether), 1,861 were killed and 29,969 were wounded in the year ending June 30, 1896, being greater loss than in many a battle of historic importance. Of the trainmen, this report (page 130) shows that nearly 1 in 9 had been killed or wounded that year, --total of over 17,000. Of these casualties, it is officially stated, 229 were killed and 8,457 were wounded in this single particular of coupling and uncoupling cars. As those figures are reported by the corporations themselves, it is not probable that they are overstated. If the railroads not reporting to the interstate commerce commission (because not engaged in interstate carrying) should be added, the figures of killed and wounded from this cause would doubtless be largely increased. By these figures, for the last year reported, nearly 9,000 men had been killed and wounded in coupling and uncoupling cars. As the corporations, on their own motion, or under compulsion of congressional action and judicial decision, have adopted self-couplers on the passenger cars, and on "over 60 per cent." of the freight cars, it will be seen how many thousands of lives and bodies have been saved thereby; but that still nearly 9,000 men should in one year be killed or wounded "coupling and uncoupling" the freight cars which up to June 30, 1896, still requires the protection of self-couplers, is the highest proof of the duty of the courts to enforce liability for failure to provide self-couplers in every case where an injury occurs from that cause. That nearly 9,000 men should still be killed and wounded in one year for failure to furnish appliances which are so widely in use, and which would entirely prevent such accidents, points out the duty of the courts.

In Witsell's Case, 120 N. C., at page 562, 27 S. E., at page 127, this court says: "If an appliance is such that the railroads should have it, the poverty of the company is no sufficient excuse for not having it." But in fact this defendant reports that this railroad has issued bonds and stocks for $76,557 per mile. N.C. R. R. Com. Report, 1896, at page 246. This is presumed to have been paid in by its issuing the bonds and stocks, and hence it should be able to furnish appliances which will protect its employés from such injuries as this, and should be held liable for failure to do so, for the interstate commerce commission report shows the self-couplers can be added for $18 per mile. In a large majority of the states, as well as by the federal government railroad commissions have been created to supervise and regulate the charges and the conduct of these corporations. The courts will be very derelict in their duty if they do not enforce justice in favor of employés as well as the public. Six years ago this court said it would soon be negligence per se whenever an accident happened for lack of a self-coupler. Congress has enacted that self-couplers should be used. For their lack, this plaintiff was injured. It is true, the defendant replies that the plaintiff remained in its service knowing it did not have self-couplers. If that were a defense, no railroad company would ever be liable for failure to put in...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT