Greenwood Ctr., Ltd. v. Nightingale

Citation465 P.3d 1269 (Mem)
Decision Date23 June 2020
Docket NumberNo. 118,860,118,860
Parties GREENWOOD CENTRE, LTD., an Oklahoma limited partnership; John Hope Franklin Center for Reconciliation, Inc., a non-profit corporation; Shannon Martin, an individual; and Bim Stephen Bruner, an individual, Petitioners, v. Rebecca Brett NIGHTINGALE, Judge of the District Court IN AND FOR TULSA COUNTY, Respondent.
CourtOklahoma Supreme Court

CORRECTED ORDER

Noma D. Gurich, CHIEF JUSTICE

Petitioners Greenwood Centre Ltd., John Hope Franklin Center for Reconciliation, Inc., Shannon Martin, and Bim Stephen Bruner's application to assume original jurisdiction is denied. Okla. Const. art. VII, § 4. Petitioners cannot establish the necessary elements for a writ of mandamus, specifically that Petitioners possess a clear legal right to the relief they seek. Chandler U.S.A., Inc. v. Tyree , 2004 OK 16, ¶¶ 24-25, 87 P.3d 598, 604-05.

DONE BY ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT IN CONFERENCE THIS 19th DAY OF JUNE, 2020.

Gurich C.J., Darby, V.C.J., Kauger, Winchester, Edmondson, Colbert, Combs (by separate writing), Kane and Rowe (by separate writing), JJ., concur.

COMBS, J., with whom, Kauger, J., joins, concurring

¶1 I concur in this order for the following reasons. Oklahoma Governor Stitt's executive order no. 2020-20, filed June 12, 2020, paragraph 15 provides:

All businesses should adhere to the statewide Open Up and Recover Safely (OURS) Plan as provided on the Oklahoma Department of Commerce website. (emphasis added)

The OURS Plan on the Oklahoma Department of Commerce's website has a specific provision for entertainment venues.1 It notes, entertainment venues, such as the BOK Center, reopened on May 1, 2020. It also provides the following social distancing guidelines:

Social Distancing Guidelines
It is at the discretion of business owners or local officials to determine when and if social distancing measures should be applied.
Business owners and event organizers should use their best judgment taking into account factors such as location and size of venue when determining the appropriate levels of social distancing and group size. (emphasis added).

The Petitioners included in their appendix the Tulsa Mayor's executive order no. 2020-10, signed June 8, 2020. This executive order provides:

2. Special Event Permits may be issued to organizers following CDC and OURS Plan guidelines for social distancing and sanitation guidelines effective June 1, 2020.
3. All businesses within the City of Tulsa , including bars, shall follow the guidance in the Governor of the State of Oklahoma's OURS Plan . (emphasis added).

There is no indication that the BOK Center needed to apply or applied for a special event permit for the subject event. There is no other local official executive order presented to this Court which provides restrictions on social distancing. Therefore, the only social distancing requirement is to follow the OURS Plan. In the context of an entertainment venue, the OURS Plan only requires a business owner to use discretion and its best judgment. The OURS Plan is permissive, suggestive and discretionary. Therefore, for a lack of any mandatory language in the OURS Plan, we are compelled to deny the relief requested.

Rowe, J. concurring:

¶1 Petitioners ask this Court to enjoin Real Parties in Interest, SMG and ASM Global Parent, Inc., which manage the BOK Center, from permitting President Trump's campaign to host a rally at the venue in Tulsa, Oklahoma, on June 20, 2020, unless the campaign institutes social distancing protocols. Nearly three weeks ago, on June 1, 2020, Oklahoma entered into Phase 3 of the Open Up and Recover Safely (OURS) Plan. In Phase 3 of the plan, business owners or local officials became vested with the discretion to determine when and if social distancing measures should be applied. Thus,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Elias v. City of Tulsa
    • United States
    • United States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
    • 17 Septiembre 2021
    ...statutes because "it is our duty to apply the law as written." Greenwood Centre, Ltd. v. Nightingale , 2020 OK 59, ¶ 3, 465 P.3d 1269, 1270 (Rowe, J., concurring) (citations omitted). Consequently, in the absence of an ambiguity, the text of a statute is the sole legitimate expression of le......
  • Morris v. Behrens
    • United States
    • United States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
    • 25 Junio 2021
    ...and application begins, and ends, with the text of a statute, see Greenwood Centre, Ltd. v. Nightingale , 2020 OK 59, ¶ 3, 465 P.3d 1269, 1270 (Rowe, J., concurring) ("[I]t is our duty to apply the law as written.") (citation omitted), we disagree with Appellant's interpretation and applica......
  • Morris v. Behrens
    • United States
    • United States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
    • 25 Junio 2021
    ...interpretation and application begins, and ends, with the text of a statute, see Greenwood Centre, Ltd. v. Nightingale, 2020 OK 59, ¶ 3, 465 P.3d 1269, 1270 (Rowe, J., concurring) ("[I]t is our duty to apply the law as written.") (citation omitted), we disagree with Appellant's interpretati......
  • Hickman v. State ex rel. Serv. Okla.
    • United States
    • United States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
    • 14 Abril 2023
    ...statutes because "it is our duty to apply the law as written." Greenwood Centre, Ltd. v. Nightingale, 2020 OK 59, ¶ 3, 465 P.3d 1269, 1270 (Rowe, J., concurring) (citations omitted). Consequently, in the absence of ambiguity, the text of a statute is the sole legitimate expression of legisl......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT