Greer v. Parker
Decision Date | 07 January 1946 |
Docket Number | 4-7782 |
Citation | 191 S.W.2d 584,209 Ark. 553 |
Parties | Greer v. Parker |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from Lee Chancery Court; A. L. Hutchins, Chancellor.
Reversed.
Daggett & Daggett, for appellant.
Hal B. Mixon, for appellee.
This is a suit by appellant, Anna C. Greer, for specific performance of a contract of sale of 120 acres of land situated in Lee county, Arkansas, made December 7, 1944 between appellant and appellee, A. C. Parker. In the contract of sale, appellee agreed to pay $ 3,600 on delivery of a valid warranty deed conveying a merchantable title. In his answer appellee admitted execution of the contract of sale and tender of a deed, but alleged in defense that the deed tendered by appellant did not convey a merchantable title. The cause was submitted to the trial court on an agreed statement of facts, and a decree was rendered dismissing the complaint for want of equity.
T. A Cathey died August 15, 1911, leaving two children, Anna C. Gardner (now Greer, appellant herein) and Mary Rainey, as his only descendants. The last will and testament of T. A. Cathey, which was probated August 26, 1911, designated appellant as executrix and trustee of the testator's property, and contained a provision necessary for a determination of the issue raised by the appeal, as follows:
According to the agreed statement of facts, appellant duly settled the estate of T. A. Cathey and fully accounted to Mary Rainey for all property devised to her under the will. Mary C. Rainey is a widow 66 years of age and the possibility of issue is extinct. She has two children, Anna R. Ivens, 45 years of age, and Ellen R. Vincent, 37 years of age. On January 8, 1926, in order to repay appellant for funds advanced to Mary Rainey and children in excess of the amount due from the estate of T. A. Cathey, they, Mary Rainey, Ellen R. Vincent, and Anna R. Ivens conveyed to appellant by warranty deed all their interest in the land involved herein.
The sole question presented by the appeal is whether the children of Mary C. Rainey took a vested, or contingent remainder under the terms of the will of T. A. Cathey. If the remainder is vested, then their interest passed to appellant under the warranty deed of January 8, 1926, and the deed tendered by the latter to appellee conveyed a merchantable title.
Many cases involving the subject of contingent and vested remainders have reached this court. In the case of McKinney v. Dillard & Coffin Co., 170 Ark. 1181, 283 S.W. 16, this court had under consideration the following language of a will: "I give to my daughter, Mary V. McKinney, during her natural life, the following described tracts: . . . and at her death I give and devise the same lands to her children in equal portions, and if at the time of Mary V. McKinney's death any of her children be dead leaving children, then such child or children is to have the same interest in said lands that said parents would have had if alive."
In considering the language of the will in that case this court said:
In the case of Jenkins v. Packingtown Realty Co., supra, the will provided: "I will and devise the east half of my said plantation to my son, James Hayes Jenkins, and his wife, Josephine, to hold, use and occupy and enjoy for and during the term of their natural lives, for the support and education of their children, and, after their death, to be equally divided between their children, share and share alike." There, this court said:
"...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Fletcher v. Hurdle
...a presumption that a woman may have issue so long as life continues. Wise v. Craig, supra. Cf. Steele v. Robinson, supra; Greer v. Parker, 209 Ark. 553, 191 S.W.2d 584. As previously pointed out, there was no evidence to indicate that Barbara Jean was incapable of bearing If there were any ......
-
Wise v. Craig
...fee to his children, issue, or heirs, and, in default of such children, issue, or heirs, to another or others * * *' In Greer v. Parker, 209 Ark. 553, 191 S.W.2d 584, 585, we quoted the classic statement from Doe, Lessee of Poor v. Considine, 6 Wall. 458, 18 L.Ed. 869, as follows: "A. devis......
-
Peebles v. Garland, 4-9900
...& Coffin Co., 170 Ark. 1181, 283 S.W. 16; Landers v. Peoples Bldg. & Loan Ass'n, 190 Ark. 1072, 81 S.W.2d 917; and Greer v. Parker, 209 Ark. 553, 191 S.W.2d 584. Obviously the rule announced in these cases does not apply to the devise here. Appellees call our attention to the inconsistency ......
-
Aluminum Co. of America v. Lipke
...remainder is indefeasibly vested in the daughters, they can join with the life tenant and convey a merchantable title. Greer v. Parker, 209 Ark. 553, 191 S.W.2d 584. But if the remainder is contingent, the remaindermen have nothing to convey. Horsley v. Hilburn, 44 Ark. 458. And, of course,......