Greer v. State, 77028
Decision Date | 15 September 1988 |
Docket Number | No. 77028,77028 |
Citation | 188 Ga.App. 808,374 S.E.2d 337 |
Parties | GREER v. The STATE. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Christopher C. Edwards, for appellant.
William G. Hamrick, Jr., Dist. Atty., Agnes McCabe, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.
Defendant appeals his conviction of the offense of burglary. Held:
1. Defendant's first two enumerations of error raise an issue of whether the trial court erred in permitting the jury to learn that defendant's co-indictee plead guilty to the same offense of burglary upon which defendant was tried. The enumerations challenge the admission of evidence as to the co-indictee's plea, comments thereon, and the trial court's refusal to "redact" the indictment before the indictment was sent out to the jury.
We have acknowledged a Foster v. State, 178 Ga.App. 478, 479, 343 S.E.2d 745. OCGA § 24-3-52 is inapplicable to the case sub judice since the co-indictee took the stand and was subject to cross-examination by defendant's attorney. Lattimore v. State, 175 Ga.App. 756, 757(5), 334 S.E.2d 701; Jones v. State, 169 Ga.App. 4, 6(6), 311 S.E.2d 485. Also, since the jury was instructed that the co-indictee's guilty plea was not to be used as evidence of defendant's guilt there was no error. See Foster v. State, 178 Ga.App. 478, 480, 481, 343 S.E.2d 745, supra. Furthermore, the trial court's leading questions to the co-indictee did not amount to a prohibited comment on the evidence since the questions propounded by the trial court did not constitute expressions or intimations of opinion as to what has or has not been proved or as to the guilt of the accused. Cannon v. State, 179 Ga.App. 142, 143(2), 345 S.E.2d 623.
2. Defendant also enumerates as error the denial of his motion for mistrial based on the assistant district attorney's statement during closing argument that the State does not undertake the prosecution of cases frivolously. Defendant argues that this statement was a thinly shrouded expression of personal opinion as to defendant's guilt.
It is well settled that a district...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sharkey v. State
...of co-conspirator admissible when admitted for "legitimate purpose" but never as evidence of defendant's guilt); Greer v. State , 188 Ga. App. 808, 374 S.E.2d 337, 338 (1988) (no error for admission of accomplice's guilty plea to same crime for which defendant is charged where the plea was ......
-
Madden v. State
...of co-conspirator admissible when admitted for “legitimate purpose” but never as evidence of defendant's guilt); Greer v. State, 188 Ga.App. 808, 374 S.E.2d 337, 338 (1988) (no error for admission of accomplice's guilty plea to same crime which defendant is charged where the plea was introd......
- Redding v. State, 76857
-
White v. State, 91-KA-590
...of co-conspirator admissible when admitted for "legitimate purpose" but never as evidence of defendant's guilt); Greer v. State, 188 Ga.App. 808, 374 S.E.2d 337, 338 (1988) (no error for admission of accomplice's guilty plea to same crime which defendant is charged where the plea was introd......