Greever v. Barker
Decision Date | 31 December 1926 |
Docket Number | 25596 |
Parties | Daniel Greever, Belle Greever and George C. Forrester, Appellants, v. W. Frank Barker and Amos Hilbrant |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Scotland Circuit Court; Hon. N. M. Pettingill Judge.
Affirmed.
J. C Dorian and John M. Jayne for appellant.
(1) When a petition is attacked by a general demurrer, all the facts well pleaded and all the inferences of fact that may be fairly and reasonably drawn from the facts pleaded, must be taken as true. If facts essential to a recovery are pleaded however inartificially or defectively, a general demurrer thereto will not lie. American Brewing Co. v. St. Louis, 187 Mo. 367. (2) Our statute provides when a man dies under guardianship the guardian must at once make his settlement with the administrator, as the administrator takes charge of the property. (3) The respondents claim the trial court was right, and cite the case of Greever v. Barker, 204 Mo.App. 190. That case does not apply to this present case. It only decides that plaintiffs could not recover against the administrator. But our petition in this case is a different case, where she has judgment against the guardian in the probate court. The probate court is a court of record, and it had jurisdiction of the subject-matter and of the parties.
J. E. Luther and Campbell & Ellison for respondents.
(1) Forrester is not guardian of Aaron Hilbrant. The petition shows that he was attempted to be appointed after the decision of the Court of Appeals. This was five years after Hilbrant's death. There having been no guardian, of course there could be no allowance against him and in favor of the Greevers. (2) The appellants have no interest in the land or in its proceeds. The guardian never acquires title to his ward's land, and he cannot make a contract affecting the title to his ward's land without authority of the probate court. Secs. 502, 503, 504, R. S. 1909; Secs. 472, 473, 474, R. S. 1919. (3) Appellants have no interest in the money. If the administrator had the right to sell the land he has the right to retain the money, and distribute it under the order of the probate court. If he had no right to sell, the purchaser might get no title, but the administrator would be entitled to retain the proceeds, so far as appellants are concerned. The sale is not subject to collateral attack. Stark v. Kirchgraber, 186 Mo. 633. (4) The petition shows on its face that appellants claim is barred by limitation. It is also barred by Sec. 468, R. S. 1919, and Sec. 498, R. S. 1909. The claim was not presented until after the former case was disposed of in the Court of Appeals. This was on July 10, 1920, more than five years after Hilbrant's death. Greever v. Barker, 204 Mo.App. 190. All demands not thus exhibited and presented to the court for allowance in one year after the appointment of the first guardian shall be forever barred. Sec. 468, R. S. 1919; Sec. 498, R. S. 1909. (5) This defense did not need to be pleaded. This is an equity suit brought by the man who should make the defense of limitations and in which he joins himself with his adversary. The defense is pleaded in so far as they are concerned. Besides the statute is mandatory and the judgment is void on its face.
Ragland, P. J. All concur, except Graves, J., absent.
This appeal is from a judgment on a general demurrer to each count of the following petition:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Bovard v. Weill
... ... Art. 18, Chap. 1, R.S. 1939, governing the administration by ... guardians and curators of insane persons. Greever v ... Barker, 289 S.W. 586, 316 Mo. 308; Porterfield v ... Farmers Exchange Bank of Gallatin, 37 S.W.2d 936; ... Jones v. Peterson, 335 Mo. 242, ... ...
-
Frost v. Timm
...re Cordes' Estate, 116 S.W.2d 207, 209; Jones v. Peterson, 72 S.W.2d 76, 85; Judson v. Walker, 155 Mo. 166, 55 S.W. 1083; Greever v. Barker, 316 Mo. 308, 289 S.W. 586; Rhodes v. Frazier, 204 S.W. 547; Seilert v. McAnally, 233 Mo. 505, 515; Webb v. Hayden, 166 Mo. 50. (3) This is an action o......
-
Jones v. Peterson
... ... whatever to bind either the person or the estate of his ward ... by contract." [Greever v. Barker, 316 Mo. 308, 289 S.W ... 586.] And, "On all contracts made by him for the benefit ... of his ward, he is personally and solely liable." ... ...
-
State ex rel. Emmons v. Hollenbeck
...at 797, and Tock v. Tock, Mo.App., 120 S.W.2d 169, 172.8 Williams v. Vaughan, 363 Mo. 639, 651, 253 S.W.2d 111, 116; Greever v. Barker, 316 Mo. 308, 289 S.W. 586, 588-589; Evans v. York, Mo.App., 216 S.W.2d 124, 128(7); Trask v. Davis, supra, 297 S.W.2d at 797(3); State ex rel. Pryor v. And......