Greiner v. Zinker, 8155
| Decision Date | 09 November 1978 |
| Docket Number | No. 8155,8155 |
| Citation | 573 S.W.2d 884 |
| Parties | Donn GREINER, Appellant, v. Deborah ZINKER, Appellee. |
| Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Kelly O'Connor, San Antonio, for appellant.
Michael Putman, San Antonio, for appellee.
Deborah Zinker, plaintiff below, sued Donn Greiner, Roy Schneider and Richmond Victory, defendants below, for personal injuries received in a multi-vehicle collision on Interstate Highway 410 West in San Antonio. Both defendant Schneider and defendant Victory settled with the plaintiff prior to the time jury selection began. The jury was not advised of that settlement. Each defendant had brought a cross action against the others for contribution and indemnity. Defendant Greiner filed a motion to limit strikes, but the court nevertheless granted each defendant and the plaintiff six peremptory strikes.
After a jury verdict, judgment was given plaintiff against defendant Greiner; relief against defendants Victory and Schneider was denied, and all costs were taxed against Greiner. It is from this judgment Greiner perfects this appeal.
His first point complains of the court's granting the two settling defendants and the plaintiff each six strikes.
Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 2151a (Vernon Supp.1976) reads as follows:
"After proper alignment of parties, it shall be the duty of the court to equalize the number of peremptory challenges provided under Rule 233, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Annotated, in accordance with the ends of justice so that no party is given an unequal advantage because of the number of peremptory challenges allowed that party."
The term "each party" in the Rule (Tex.R.Civ.P. 233 ) means each litigant or group of litigants whose interest is Antagonistic to another litigant or group of litigants. Retail Credit Co. v. Hyman, 316 S.W.2d 769 (Tex.Civ.App. Houston 1958, writ ref'd); Perkins v. Freeman, 518 S.W.2d 532, 533 (Tex.1954). The equalizing of the number of peremptory challenges is to be done "in accordance with the ends of justice so that no party is given an unequal advantage." Perkins v. Freeman, supra at 534. See also Council v. Bankers Commercial Life Ins. Co., 558 S.W.2d 487 (Tex.Civ.App. Beaumont 1977, writ ref'd n. r. e.).
In the case at bar, plaintiff agreed to settle with defendants Schneider and Victory irrespective of the outcome of the trial; Victory to pay her $6,000, Schneider to pay $6,750. In return plaintiff agreed to settle...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Elbaor v. Smith
...S.W.2d 669 (Tex.1979); Clayton v. Volkswagenwerk, 606 S.W.2d 15 (Tex.Civ.App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1980, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Greiner v. Zinker, 573 S.W.2d 884 (Tex.Civ.App.--Beaumont 1978, no writ); David R. Miller, Comment, Mary Carter Agreements: Unfair and Unnecessary, 32 SW.L.J. 779 (19......
-
Scurlock Oil Co. v. Smithwick
...agreement is formed. The trial court must know of Mary Carter agreements to fairly align the parties and equalize jury strikes. Greiner v. Zinker, 573 S.W.2d 884 (Tex.Civ.App.--Beaumont 1978, no writ); see also City of Houston v. Sam P. Wallace & Co., 585 S.W.2d 669, 673-74 (Tex.1979). The ......
-
Malone & Hyde, Inc. v. Hobrecht
...of such an agreement and Malone concedes that in the absence of such an agreement there was antagonism. Reliance is placed upon Greiner v. Zinker, 573 S.W.2d 884 (Tex.Civ.App.--Beaumont 1978, no writ) and City of Houston v. Sam P. Wallace & Co., 585 S.W.2d 669 (Tex.1979). Both of these case......
-
Garcia v. Central Power & Light Co.
...is whether the defendants are antagonistic with respect to each other. See Perkins v. Freeman, 518 S.W.2d at 533; Greiner v. Zinker, 573 S.W.2d 884, 885 (Tex.Civ.App.--Beaumont 1978, no During the pre-trial hearing conducted immediately before the voir dire examination, the trial court aske......