Griffin v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co., 194

• Decision Date: 07 April 1965
• Docket Number: No. 194,194
• Citation: 141 S.E.2d 300,264 N.C. 212
• Court: North Carolina Supreme Court
• Parties: Rebecca GRIFFIN, b/n/f Charleen Greene, v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY.

Page 300

141 S.E.2d 300

264 N.C. 212

Rebecca GRIFFIN, b/n/f Charleen Greene, v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY.

No. 194.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 7, 1965.

J. Donnell Lassiter and Kennedy, Covington, Lobdell & Hickman, Charlotte, for defendant appellant.

Horace M. DuBose, III, Gastonia, for plaintiff appellee.

RODMAN, Justice.

Plaintiff's assignments of error present this question: Did the court commit prejudicial error in admitting evidence offered for the purpose of showing an unauthorized cancelation?

The policy, a standard form, permits cancelation by the insured 'by mailing to the company written notice stating when thereafter the cancelation shall become effective.' The policy permits cancelation by the company 'by mailing to the named insured at the address shown in this policy written notice stating when not less than ten days thereafter such cancelation shall be effective.'

Touching the duty of insurer, upon cancelation to refund unearned premiums, the policy provides: 'If the named insured cancels, earned premiums shall be computed in accordance with the customary short rate table and procedure. If the company cancels, earned premium shall be computed pro rata. Premium adjustment may be made either at the time cancelation is effected or as soon as practicable after cancelation becomes effective, but payment or tender of unearned premium is not a condition of cancelation.' (Emphasis supplied.)

The policy afforded protection for a period of one year, from February 27, 1961, unless canceled before that date. When the policy was issued, Sadler did not have sufficient funds to pay the premium in full. She paid $13.50 and contracted with the Insurance Premium Discount Company (IPD) to pay the balance. This balance, with IPD's financing charge, amounted to $27.00. It was payable in monthly installments of $4.50. Defendant received the premium for one year. Sadler appointed IPD her attorney in fact. She authorized it to cancel and 'give notice of cancelation of said insurance policy, and said insurance company is hereby authorized and directed to cancel said policy and to pay Insurance Premium Discount Company the unearned or return premiums thereon without proof of default or of the amount owing to the Insurance Premium Discount Company. Said insurance company is hereby authorized to rely upon all statements made by Insurance Premium Discount Company as to the occurrence or continuance of default, the amount owing to it, and as to every other matter pertaining to this contract and said policies.'

On June 8, 1961, IPD wrote defendant a letter, which it received on June 9, 1961. The letter stated that Sadler had failed to make the $4.50 monthly payment due it on May 25, 1961. The letter stated: '[W]e request immediate cancellation of the above policy and ask that you forward your check to us for the unearned premium. Enclosed is a copy of the Power of Attorney duly executed by the Insured.' Defendant canceled the policy 'effective on the 30th day of June 1961, at 12:01 a. m.' Notice of this cancelation was given to the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles on July 13, 1961. He mailed notice of cancelation to Sadler. She received the notice on July 14th. Additionally, there was evidence that defendant, on June 12, mailed notice to Sadler of the cancelation of her policy 'to become effective on the 30th day of June 1961 at 12:01 a. m.' On July 18, 1961, defendant paid to IPD $16.69, the unearned portion of the annual premium, as computed by it.

Plaintiff, over defendant's objection, was permitted to offer evidence showing: IPD had not notified Sadler of her...