Griffin v. Owens

Decision Date02 January 1934
Docket Number13742.
Citation172 S.E. 221,171 S.C. 276
PartiesGRIFFIN v. OWENS et al. CALDWELL v. SAME. BRIDWELL v. SAME.
CourtSouth Carolina Supreme Court

Appeal from Common Pleas Circuit Court of Richland County; W. H Grimball, Judge.

Actions by James C. Griffin, by Catherine Caldwell, by her guardian ad litem, Mrs. Eva Mae Caldwell, and by Mrs. Beulah Bridwell by her guardian ad litem, D. W. Bridwell, against Sam H Owens and Chevrolet coach, Motor No. 2656890, Serial No 23735, and bearing South Carolina license No. R-4--201. From an order granting plaintiffs' motion to change the place of trial from county of defendant's residence to county of plaintiffs' residence, defendants appeal.

Affirmed.

Herbert & Dial, G. Duncan Bellinger, and Joseph L. Nettles, all of Columbia, for appellants.

Johnston & Williams and Lyles & Daniel, all of Spartanburg, for respondents.

W. C. COTHRAN, Acting Associate Justice.

These three actions were commenced in November, 1931, and grew out of an automobile accident which occurred in the county of Spartanburg. The plaintiffs are residents of Spartanburg county, and the defendant Owens is a resident of Richland county. The automobile which, it is alleged, caused the damage was not attached.

The suits were brought in Spartanburg county, and shortly thereafter the defendant Owens obtained an order from the court of common pleas of Spartanburg county transferring the case to Richland county for trial upon the ground that he (Owens) was a resident of Richland county. Thereafter the plaintiffs made a motion before Circuit Judge Grimball for an order changing the place of trial from Richland county to Spartanburg county upon the ground that the convenience of the witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted by such change. Judge Grimball granted the motion, and this appeal is from his order.

The principal facts, to wit, that the accident occurred in Spartanburg county, and that the defendant Owens is a resident of Richland county, are not disputed, and two sections of the Code are relied upon by the parties. The first section, to the effect that the suit must be tried in the county where the defendant resides (Code 1932, § 422), is relied upon by the defendants, and the other section, to the effect that the place of trial may be removed when the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted, is relied upon by the plaintiffs (Code 1932, § 426(3...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Roof v. Tiller
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • April 3, 1940
    ... ... 136] ... discretion as to amount to a deprivation of the legal rights ... of the complaining party. ***" Griffin v. Owens et ... al., 171 S.C. 276, 172 S.E. 221, 222 ...          In that ... case an automobile collision occurred in Spartanburg ... ...
  • Shelton v. Southern Kraft Corp.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • July 31, 1940
    ... ... corporation's mills and offices are situated in ... Georgetown County ...          In the ... case of Griffin v. Owens, 171 S.C. 276, 172 S.E ... 221, 222, this Court said: "*** This court will not ... interfere with the discretion exercised by a circuit ... ...
  • McIntyre v. United Five Cent & Ten Cent Stores, Inc.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • January 2, 1934
  • Wade v. Southern Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • March 4, 1938
    ... ... amount to a deprivation of the legal rights of the ... complaining ... [195 S.E. 561.] ... party." Griffin v. Owens, 171 S.C. 276, 172 S.E. 221, ...          There ... are numerous other cases in which our court has stated that a ... matter in ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT