Griffin v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.
Decision Date | 08 March 1939 |
Docket Number | No. 2202-7249.,2202-7249. |
Citation | 125 S.W.2d 545 |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Parties | GRIFFIN et al. v. STANOLIND OIL & GAS CO. |
This suit, in so far as this appeal is concerned, is an action of trespass to try title instituted by the plaintiffs in error, K. W. Griffin, F. E. Lumpkin, individually, and John Protho, as guardian of the estate of Maurice Protho, a minor, against the Stanolind Oil and Gas Company, to recover an undivided interest in the oil and gas leasehold estate held by the Company in a certain tract of twenty and a fraction acres in Gregg County. The said tract of twenty and a fraction acres is a part of a 54-acre tract belonging to Alex Lockhart and the heirs of his first wife. The case was tried before the court without a jury and judgment was rendered in favor of the Stanolind Company. On appeal, the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the judgment of the trial court. 102 S.W.2d 231. The plaintiffs in error have been granted the writ of error.
The material facts are substantially as follows:
Prior to February, 1930, Alex Lockhart and Julia Lockhart were husband and wife. During such marriage relation, Alex bought the 54-acre tract mentioned above. The children of this marriage were Ruth (who married Frank Lockhart) and Lovie (who married Lonnie Coulter). Julia had two children by a former marriage, namely: Effie Thomas and another daughter, Minnie Protho, who died intestate leaving five children: Elihu Protho, Obie Protho, Naomi Protho, James Protho and Maurice Protho. Julia died intestate on February 3, 1930, leaving as her heirs Ruth and Lovie, Effie Thomas and the five children of Minnie Protho, deceased.
Alex married his second wife, Cohesia, soon after Julia died. On October 9, 1930, Alex and his second wife, Cohesia, and Ruth and Lovie, and their respective husbands, executed to L. A. Grelling, Jr., and O. M. Boren, an oil and gas lease covering said 54-acre tract of land along with two other tracts. The three tracts contained in the aggregate 181¾ acres. So far as appears from the record before us, only the 54-acre tract belonged to the community estate of Alex and his first wife, Julia. Omitting immaterial provisions, said lease reads as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
First Nat. Bank in Dallas v. Kinabrew
...... Griffin v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co., 133 Tex. 45, 125 S.W.2d 545, 548 (Tex.Comm'n . Page 150 . App.1939, opinion adopted); See also Davis v. Magnolia ......
-
Turner v. Sawyer
...convey her title and that of the heirs was not affected by the fact that the debt was barred by limitation. In Griffin v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co., 133 Tex. 45, 125 S.W.2d 545, our Supreme Court held that the surviving husband was authorized, as against the claims of the wife's heirs, to con......
-
Davis v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.
...action of this Court upon an assignment predicated upon a similar contention made by plaintiff in error in Griffin et al. v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Company, Tex.Com.App, 125 S.W.2d 545, we have concluded that the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals upon this point is Such a conveyance by a g......
-
Wilson v. Meredith, Clegg & Hunt, 4971
...selling the estate of the community. Stone v. Jackson, 109 Tex. 385, 210 S.W. 953 and cases cited therein. Griffin v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co., 133 Tex. 45, 125 S.W.2d 545 and cases cited; Iiams v. Mager, Tex.Civ.App., 216 S.W. 422; Jones v. Harris, Tex.Civ.App., 139 S.W. 69; Kinard v. Sims,......