Griffin v. State
| Decision Date | 15 April 1974 |
| Docket Number | No. 47826,47826 |
| Citation | 293 So.2d 810 |
| Parties | Johnny Frank GRIFFIN v. STATE of Mississippi. |
| Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
Michael D. Jonas, Aberdeen, for appellant.
A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by John C. Underwood, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.
Appellant Johnny Frank Griffin and his brothers, James Griffin, Jr. and David Griffin, were jointly indicted in the Circuit Court of Monroe County for the crime of murder in the killing of Sallie Loreen Barker. Appellant was granted severance, and on trial, he was convicted. He was sentenced to life imprisonment in the State Penitentiary. From this conviction and sentence he appeals, we reverse and remand.
The evidence on behalf of the state established that on or about 10:00 p.m. on July 14, 1972, appellant and his brothers forcibly seized Sallie Loreen Barker and put her into a 1971 black and white Buick automobile. While she was screaming and hollering, they drove away from the scene. On the following morning, the body of Sallie Loreen Barker was discovered in a ditch alongside a county road in the Darracott community of Monroe County. She was nude, and her clothes were not found at the scene. An autopsy was performed and the pathologist testified that Sallie Loreen Barker died as a result of a hemorrhage over the brain caused by multiple injuries to the head, scalp, face and the base of the skull and neck. It was his opinion that the injuries were inflicted by a long, wide or round object. The pathologist also testified that he found numerous sperm cells in the victim's vagina indicating sexual intercourse had occurred within forty-eight hours of death.
The sheriff's office put out an item on the Griffin brothers and appellant and his brother James were arrested in Utah on July 21, 1972. They were subsequently returned to Monroe County to face a charge of murder.
Appellant's brother James Griffin testified on behalf of appellant and said that on the day in question he, appellant and their brother David were riding around in Aberdeen in a black and white Buick automobile with Florida license plates. Appellant was driving when they saw Sallie Loreen Barker whom he knew. He asked her to go with them to the truck stop, and she consented to go. She got into the car, and they drove over to the Daniel Baptist Church where they let David out of the car because David said he was too high and wanted to get some sleep. While stopped, Johnny who had been driving, got into the back seat. James said he and Loreen got in the front seat, and Johnny, who had been drinking all day, lay down on the back seat and went to sleep. On the way to the truck stop located near West Point, he told Sallie Loreen that he had changed his mind and he was not going to the truck stop but was going to leave Aberdeen. Sallie Loreen then said, 'Well, you mean to tell me that you made me miss my date that I was going to see tonight and then you tell me you ain't going to take me nowhere.' James said he repeated that he was not going to take her to the truck stop because he was leaving. Sallie Loreen then opened her purse and took out a knife. James stopped the car, opened the door and got out. As he was getting out, he reached under the front seat and got a jack handle. He said that Sallie Loreen got out of the front seat and came toward him with the knife. He then backed away and told her to get back. When she kept coming on him with the knife, he struck her several times with the jack handle. He picked up the knife, got back in the car and drove to Memphis. On cross examination, he said Johnny was asleep because he was out and never at any time work up until they were in Memphis about sunup the next morning. James testified that he never told Johnny what had happened. He said he threw the knife away in Memphis and that Sallie Loreen was fully clothed at the time he beat her with the jack handle. They left Memphis and drove to San Francisco, California, and back to Utah where they were arrested.
Appellant did not testify in his own behalf and made a motion for a directed verdict which was overruled.
Appellant urges among other things that the trial court was in error in overruling his motion for a directed verdict and refusing his peremptory instruction, instructing the jury to find him not guilty. Appellant argues that the state relied entirely on circumstantial evidence to connect him with the crime, that he produced a witness who admits that he killed the victim, and further, that this witness completely established that appellant did not in any way aid, abet or encourage the crime. Appellant insists that under these circumstances,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Sharkey v. State
...guilt). See also Johns v. State , 592 So.2d 86 (Miss. 1991) ; Henderson v. State , 403 So.2d 139 (Miss. 1981) ; Griffin v. State , 293 So.2d 810, 812-13 (Miss. 1974).10 Specifically, the Court noted that "a plea of guilty ... is[ ] a prior admission of guilt, which is consistent with the te......
-
Stevens v. State
...and that mere presence is insufficient to convict him as an aider and abettor. See Vaughn, 712 So.2d at 724 (citing Griffin v. State, 293 So.2d 810, 812 (Miss.1974) (mere presence is ¶ 49. The trial court properly instructed the jury on these legal guidelines governing conviction as an aide......
-
Welch v. State
...of manslaughter when a person is slain without malice during the commission of certain felonies, including kidnapping. In Griffin v. State, 293 So.2d 810 (Miss.1974), we held that the defendant could be convicted for manslaughter under Miss.Code Ann., Sec. 97-3-27 when he participated in th......
-
Johns v. State, 89-KA-0705
...524, 528 (Miss.1969). Relying upon this rule in Henderson v. State, 403 So.2d 139, 141 (Miss.1981) this Court reasoned: In Griffin v. State, 293 So.2d 810 (Miss.1974), this Court The only other error assigned ... is that the state was allowed to bring out on cross-examination of James Griff......