Griffin v. State, 4D17-3427

Decision Date19 December 2018
Docket NumberNo. 4D17-3427,4D17-3427
Citation268 So.3d 728 (Mem)
Parties Charles Thomas GRIFFIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Charles Thomas Griffin, Bonifay, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mitchell A. Egber, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Appellant Charles Griffin appeals his probation revocation and resulting sentence, raising twelve issues. We affirm the revocation and sentence and remand only for the entry of a written order specifying which conditions of the probation agreement were violated. As the State properly concedes, although the trial court orally pronounced the violations of probation, the record lacks a written order. See Robinson v. State , 74 So.3d 570, 572 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) ("Even though the record is clear, a formal, written order specifying each condition of probation violated must be entered in this case. Therefore, we remand for entry of an order in conformity with this opinion.").

Affirmed and remanded with directions.

Warner, May and Forst, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Maldonado v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 21, 2019
    ...the matter should be remanded for entry of an order listing the specific conditions violated." (citation omitted)); Griffin v. State , 268 So. 3d 728, 729 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018).ConclusionWe affirm the revocation of probation and the court's denial of Maldonado's motion to suppress but remand ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT