Griffith v. State, ED 90665.
Decision Date | 16 September 2008 |
Docket Number | No. ED 90665.,ED 90665. |
Citation | 263 S.W.3d 784 |
Parties | Shannon D. GRIFFITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Charles County, Jon A. Cunningham, Judge.
Gwenda R. Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Richard A. Starnes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, JJ.
Shannon Griffith appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Griffith v. Larkins
...Petitioner's Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's denial was affirmed on appeal. See Griffith v. State, 263 S.W.3d 784 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008). Petitioner is currently incarcerated at the Eastern Reception Diagnostic and Correctional Center in Bonne Terre, Missou......
-
Moore v. Rhodes
... ... On" and identify the trial court's ruling or action that the appellant challenges, must state concisely the legal reasons for the claim of reversible error, and must explain summarily why, in ... ...