Griffith v. State, ED 90665.

Decision Date16 September 2008
Docket NumberNo. ED 90665.,ED 90665.
Citation263 S.W.3d 784
PartiesShannon D. GRIFFITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Charles County, Jon A. Cunningham, Judge.

Gwenda R. Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Richard A. Starnes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Shannon Griffith appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Griffith v. Larkins
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Missouri
    • 10 Abril 2012
    ...Petitioner's Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's denial was affirmed on appeal. See Griffith v. State, 263 S.W.3d 784 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008). Petitioner is currently incarcerated at the Eastern Reception Diagnostic and Correctional Center in Bonne Terre, Missou......
  • Moore v. Rhodes
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 16 Septiembre 2008
    ... ... On" and identify the trial court's ruling or action that the appellant challenges, must state concisely the legal reasons for the claim of reversible error, and must explain summarily why, in ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT