Griggs v. Griggs, S90A0782
| Decision Date | 08 June 1990 |
| Docket Number | No. S90A0782,S90A0782 |
| Parties | GRIGGS v. GRIGGS. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Bruce Wilson, Atlanta, for Griggs.
Gail Tusan Joyner, Joyner & Joyner, Atlanta, for Griggs.
In a divorce action, a jury awarded to the wife the marital residence, personal property, two automobiles, and funds in various accounts. The husband was awarded two automobiles, personal property, and all accounts in his name. The trial court granted the husband's motion for a new trial as to equitable division of the marital residence only. We granted the wife's application for discretionary appeal to determine the appropriateness of this order.
1. In Stone v. Stone, 258 Ga. 716, 373 S.E.2d 627 (1988), we analyzed the trial court's amendment of a jury verdict in light of OCGA § 9-12-7, as follows:
OCGA § 9-12-7 provides, in part:
"[A]fter a verdict has been received and recorded and the jury has been dispersed, it may not be amended in matter of substance either by what the jurors say they intended to find or otherwise."
We must assume that the allocation of resources, under the scheme adopted by the jury in its verdict, was based upon the jury's expectation that no party would be required to pay litigation costs incurred by the other party. The trial court's award of a substantial sum in litigation expenses to the wife worked a change "in matter of substance" of the jury's allocation of resources between the parties. Accordingly, the case must be remanded for a new trial. [Id. at 717, 373 S.E.2d 627.]
2. Applying the reasoning of Stone, supra, we hold that the trial court should not have granted a new trial on a sole issue of equitable division. The motion must be granted or denied. 1 If it is granted, all issues of the allocation of economic resources must be determined de novo.
Judgment reversed and case remanded for appropriate order on the motion for new trial.
All the Justices concur.
1 See also Spence v. Hilliard, 260 Ga. 107, 389 S.E.2d 753 (1990) ().
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Payson v. Payson
...its equitable division of marital property. Jones v. Jones, 264 Ga. 169, 170, 441 S.E.2d 745 (1994). See also Griggs v. Griggs, 260 Ga. 249(2), 392 S.E.2d 11 (1990), where this Court ruled that if a trial court grants a motion for new trial due to an error in the distribution of property, e......
- Pender v. Witcher
- Bentley v. B.M.W., Inc., A93A0199
- Witcher v. Pender, S90G0456
-
Evidence - Marc T. Treadwell
...Id. at 359, 487 S.E.2d at 11. 91. Id. 92. Id. 93. Id. 94. 260 Ga. 248, 392 s.e.2d 6 (1990). 95. O.C.G.A. Sec. 42-8-60 to -65 (1997). 96. 260 Ga. at 249, 392 s.e.2d at 8. For a discussion of Witcher v. Pender, see Marc T. Treadwell, Evidence, 43 mercer L. rev. 257, 270 (1991). 97. 268 Ga. 79......