Griggs v. Pullman Co.
Decision Date | 07 July 1931 |
Docket Number | No. 21623.,21623. |
Citation | 40 S.W.2d 463 |
Parties | GRIGGS et al. v. PULLMAN CO. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court; Claude O. Pearcy, Judge.
"Not to be officially published."
Proceeding under the Workmen's Compensation Act by Minnie Walker Griggs and Roxie Anna Griggs, claimants, opposed by the Pullman Company, employer. Award of the Compensation Commission denying Minnie Walker Griggs compensation, and awarding Roxie Anna Griggs compensation, was affirmed by the circuit court, and defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
Lehmann & Lehmann, of St. Louis, for appellant.
Bass & Bass and John Grossman, all of St. Louis, for respondent.
This is an action for compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act (Laws 1927, p. 490) for the death of Roosevelt Griggs. Plaintiffs both claim compensation as his widows. He was in the employ of the defendant, as a porter, at the time he received the injury which caused his death. There is no dispute that his death resulted from an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. The commission found against Minnie Walker Griggs and in favor of Roxie Anna Griggs, awarding the latter compensation. Minnie Walker Griggs and the defendant appealed to the circuit court, where the award of the commission was, in all respects, affirmed. From the judgment of the circuit court affirming the award, the defendant appeals.
Defendant insists here that there is not sufficient evidence in the record to support the award of the commission.
The commission found that the deceased married Minnie Walker on December 9, 1920, in the city of St. Louis; that he lived with her about nine months; that they then moved from St. Louis to Memphis, at which place she left him, and returned to St. Louis, while he remained in Memphis; that she never lived with him thereafter; that after she returned to St. Louis she was running around with different men, and that a child was born to her in June, 1924, from her relationship with one Henry Nash; that Roxie Anna was married to deceased on June 27, 1926, in Crittenden county, Ark.; that deceased continued to live with plaintiff from the time of their marriage until his death; that their marriage was a valid marriage; that she survived him as his widow; and that he was under legal liability to support her at the time of his injury.
When a second marriage is shown, it is clothed with every presumption of validity. The law presumes innocence, not guilt; morality, not immorality; marriage, not concubinage. If the validity of the second marriage is attacked, the burden is on the attacking party to prove its invalidity, and if, in assuming this burden, which the law demands, it becomes necessary to prove a negative, he must do so. The presumption in favor of the validity of the second marriage is not to be lightly repelled. It is not to be broken in upon or shaken by a mere balance of probability. The evidence for the purpose of repelling it must be strong, distinct, satisfactory, and conclusive. The invalidity of the second marriage cannot be found, unless the parties holding the burden of establishing it complete a chain of evidence which will aggressively exclude every indication or suggestion which might conceivably rescue the second marriage from invalidity. Johnson v. St. Joe Terminal Ry. Co., 203 Mo. 381, 101 S. W. 641; Nelson v. Jones, 245 Mo. 579, 151 S. W. 80; Woods v. American Coal & Ice Company (Mo. App.) 25 S.W.(2d) 144; Klein v. Laudman, 29 Mo. 259; In re Salvin's Will, 106 Misc. Rep. 111, 173 N. Y. S. 897; Hale v. Hale, 40 Okl. 101, 135 P. 1143; Schubert v. Barnholt, 177 Iowa, 232, 158 N. W. 662; Maier v. Brock, 222 Mo. 74, 120 S. W. 1167, 133 Am. St. Rep. 513, 17 Ann. Cas. 673; Jackson v. Phalen, 237 Mo. 142, 140 S. W. 879; Phillips v. Wilson, 298 Mo. 186, 250 S. W. 408; Osmak v. American Car & Foundry Co. (Mo. Sup.) 40 S.W.(2d) 714, not yet reported [in State report].
Minnie Walker Griggs, at the hearing before the commission, testified in her own behalf as follows:
In her deposition, taken about two months after the death of the deceased, Minnie Walker Griggs testified as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hartman v. Valier & Spies Milling Co.
... ... validity of the marriage. Osmak v. American Car & Foundry ... Co., 40 S.W.2d 714; Griggs v. Pullman Co., 40 ... S.W.2d 463; Maier v. Brock, 222 Mo. 74; Thomson ... v. Thomson, 236 Mo.App. 1223. (3) The unimpeached ... testimony of ... ...
-
Forbis v. Forbis, 7337
...714, 717(1), 77 A.L.R. 722; Ribas v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation, Mo.App., 95 S.W.2d 1221, 1224(3); Griggs v. Pullman Co., Mo.App., 40 S.W.2d 463, 464(2)]; and, that a marriage will not be declared invalid except upon clear, cogent and convincing proof [Smith v. Smith, Mo., 237 ......
-
Leichty v. Kansas City Bridge Co.
...Carburetor Co., Mo. App., 94 S.W. 2d 1130; Sanders v. Central Building Materials Co., Mo. App., 43 S.W. 2d 863; and Griggs v. Pullman Co., Mo. App., 40 S.W. 2d 463. the case at bar the principles to be applied are found in the decisions which hold that in the absence of waiver a judgment is......
-
In re Pilcher's Estate
... ... Marsh , 1926, 79 Cal.App. 560, 250 P. 411; ... Everett v. Standard Accident Ins. Co. , ... 1920, 45 Cal.App. 332, 187 P. 996; Griggs v ... Pullman Co. , 1931, Mo. App., 40 S.W.2d 463; ... Holman v. Holman , 1926, Tex. Com. App., 288 ... S.W. 413; Pittinger v. Pittinger ... ...