Grim v. Moore, (No. 8863)
Decision Date | 06 June 1939 |
Docket Number | (No. 8863) |
Citation | 121 W.Va. 299 |
Court | West Virginia Supreme Court |
Parties | Leroy Grim, an Infant v. Thomas R. Moore,Administrator |
"In an action brought in this state to recover damages for a personal injury received in another state, the right of recovery will be tested by the laws of that state." Clise v. Prunty, 108 W. Va. 635, 152 S. E. 201.
While the rule is established that a father is primarily responsible for expenses necessarily incurred in the treatment of his injured infant, yet when the father is dead, leaving no estate, the rule can have no application. In such case the infant himself is liable for the expenses, and may recover them from the person causing the injury, if it was tortious.
Error to Circuit Court, Jefferson County.
Personal injury action by LeRoy Grim, an infant, etc., against Thomas R. Moore, administrator, etc. To review a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant brings error.
Affirmed.
L. I. Rice and T. Russell Cather, for plaintiff in error. Lee Bushong, Jr., and Moore & Williams, for defendant in error.
Plaintiff, an infant and a guest in an automobile which wrecked, recovered a judgment of $5,000.00 for injuries suffered thereby, against the estate of the person operating the automobile.
The wreck occurred in Virginia, and plaintiff's right of recovery is subject to the laws of that state. Clise v. Prunty, 108 W. Va. 635, 152 S. E. 201. In Virginia, only gross negligence makes the operator of a car liable for guest injuries. Wood v. Shrewsbury, 117 W. Va. 569, 571, 186 S. E. 294. The defendant contends that his decedent was guiltless of gross negligence as a matter of law; that the jury was not properly instructed and that evidence of plaintiff's doctor and hospital bills was improperly admitted.
The circuit court rendered the following opinion which we consider a fair statement of both the facts and the law:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Packard v. Perry
...is liable for the expenses, and may recover them from the person causing the injury, if it was tortious." Syllabus Point 2 of Grim v. Moore, 121 W.Va. 299, 3 S.E.2d 448 (1939). 5. The right to maintain an action to recover pre-majority medical expenses incurred as a result of a minor's pers......
-
Tice v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
...wherein a cause of action arose governs its survivability * * *'. See Goldstein v. Gilbert, 125 W.Va. 250, 23 S.E.2d 606; Grim v. Moore, 121 W.Va. 299, 3 S.E.2d 448; Keesee v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp., 120 W.Va. 201, 197 S.E. 522. In West Virginia it is held: '1. The common law rule that an......
-
Nugen v. Hildebrand
...Upon the question of whether he was entitled to prove and recover for medical and hospital expenses and loss of earnings, Grim v. Moore, 121 W.Va. 299, 3 S.E.2d 448, is controlling. The 2nd Syllabus Point reads: 'While the rule is established that a father is primarily responsible for expen......