Grimes v. State, BI-412
| Decision Date | 19 December 1986 |
| Docket Number | No. BI-412,BI-412 |
| Citation | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 123,499 So.2d 42 |
| Parties | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 123 George Nedham GRIMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Clyde M. Collins, Jr., of Cotney & Collins, Jacksonville, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and John M. Koenig, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
Grimes appeals from the imposition of costs pursuant to Section 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1985). As a result of a plea bargain with the State, appellant pled guilty to a lewd and lascivious act upon a child. The trial court assessed court costs of $200 plus $52.50, and precluded an award of gain time until the costs were paid in full. Appellant's ore tenus motion requesting that the court declare appellant indigent for purposes of receiving community service in lieu of court costs to acquire gain time was denied.
Appellant contends that: (1) court costs pursuant to Section 27.3455 Florida Statutes were intended to be imposed only on non-indigent persons; (2) the trial court erred in assessing appellant court costs without notice and a full opportunity to object, and without a hearing to determine if he was indigent; and (3) that the statute is unconstitutional as embracing more than one subject, as well as having a defective title. We agree with grounds one and two and disagree with his third argument. Indigency is to be determined at the time of sentencing and those persons found to be indigent must be ordered to serve a term of community service in lieu of additional costs. Lawton v. State, 492 So.2d 404 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Slaughter v. State, 493 So.2d 1109 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Day v. State, 496 So.2d 986 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
Further we find that the assessment of costs against an indigent person is permissible only after a defendant is given adequate notice, and an opportunity to object. Also, the collection of the costs can be enforced only after a finding that the defendant has the ability to pay. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984); Hughes v. State, 497 So.2d 938 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). However we reject appellant's argument that Section 27.3455 is unconstitutional in that the title is defective or that it embraces more than one subject matter. Hughes. Based on the above we find that the trial court erred in imposing court costs on appellant.
Finally appellant argues that the trial court erred in sentencing him in excess of the guidelines without a scoresheet and written reasons for departure. We disagree. It is obvious from the record that appellant agreed in plea negotiations with the state that he would plead to a second degree felony of lewd and lascivious assault upon a child instead of being convicted of sexual battery upon a child, a capital felony. He entered this...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Jacobs v. State
...v. State, 519 So.2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Quarterman v. State, 506 So.2d 50, 52 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); see also Grimes v. State, 499 So.2d 42, 43 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). Accordingly, we affirm the sentences under Affirmed. BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ., concur. DANIEL PEARSON, Judge, concurring. The......
-
Blackwell v. State
...sentences and not an agreement to cap a sentence. See Lawson v. State, 497 So. 2d 288, 289 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) ; Grimes v. State , 499 So. 2d 42, 43 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). Where the parties to a plea agreement consent to a capped sentence rather than a particular sentence, any error in the sc......
-
Thomas v. State, 87-1283
...entitled to a hearing prior to the imposition of restitution. See also Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984), and Grimes v. State, 499 So.2d 42 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). In the case at bar, there simply was no adequate hearing on the question of his financial resources. The state argues tha......
-
Orsi v. State, 87-1128
...In exchange for the reduction, Orsi stipulated to the twenty-year sentence. Under similar circumstances the court in Grimes v. State, 499 So.2d 42 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), upheld a departure guidelines sentence. We are convinced that Orsi would have received the same sentence notwithstanding th......