Grimshaw v. Kent
Decision Date | 10 July 1903 |
Docket Number | 13,237 |
Citation | 67 Kan. 463,73 P. 92 |
Parties | HOWARD L. GRIMSHAW et al. v. I. L. KENT, as Administrator, etc |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Decided July, 1903.
Error from Miami district court; W. H. SHELDON, judge.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.
1. CONTRACT--Evidence of Mental Capacity. Where the issue tar be tried relates to the mental capacity of one to enter into a contract, non-expert witnesses who have been thrown in close and intimate relations with the person whose mental capacity is questioned, and who have had ample opportunity of observing the conduct of such person, may give in evidence their opinion as to the mental capacity of such person at the time the contract was made.
2. CONTRACT--Transactions with Deceased Person. In an action by an administrator of the estate of a deceased person, the defendants, if otherwise qualified, may testify as to the mental capacity of the deceased at the time the contract is claimed to have been made.
3. CONTRACT--Privileged Communications--Attorney and Client. A lawyer who prepared a contract at the request of such deceased person may be permitted to give in evidence a conversation with the deceased at the time the contract was executed, for the purpose of showing that the deceased knew and understood the contents of the contract, if the relation of attorney and client did not exist between the witness and such deceased person.
J. E Maxwell, and W. T. Johnston, for plaintiffs in error.
Frank M. Sheridan, for defendant in error.
OPINION
This action was brought by I. L. Kent, administrator of the estate of Elizabeth C. Grimshaw, deceased, against Howard L. Grimshaw and Olive A. Grimshaw, his wife, son and daughter-in-law of Elizabeth C. Grimshaw, to recover the sum of $ 1950, alleged to be money of the estate in the hands of defendants. As shown by the record, defendants lived at Winslow, Ariz. Deceased had placed this money in their hands to invest for her, higher rates of interest being obtainable in Arizona than at the home of deceased in Kansas. In November, 1901, the following contract was executed by the parties:
This contract and compliance with its terms were pleaded by def...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Wheeler v. McKeon
...Ga. 139, 37 S. E. 183;Kostelecky v. Scherhart, 99 Iowa, 120, 68 N. W. 591;Smith v. Guerre (Tex. Civ. App.) 159 S. W. 417;Grimshaw v. Kent, 67 Kan. 463, 73 Pac. 92;Lamb v. Lamb, 105 Ind. 456, 5 N. E. 171;Williams v. Williams, 90 Ky. 28, 13 S. W. 250;Ducker v. Whitson, 112 N. C. 44, 16 S. E. ......
-
Wheeler v. McKeon
... ... 139, 37 S.E. 183; Kostelecky v. Scherhart, 99 Iowa ... 120, 61 N.W. 591; Smith v. Guerre (Tex. Civ. App.) ... 159 S.W. 417; Grimshaw v. Kent, 67 Kan. 463, 73 P ... 92; Lamb v. Lamb, 105 Ind. 456, 5 N.E. 171; ... Williams' Exr. v. Williams, 90 Ky. 28, 13 S.W ... 250; Ducker v ... ...
-
Wheeler v. McKeon
...Ga. 139, 37 S. E. 183; Kostelecky v. Scherhart, 99 Iowa, 120, 61 N. W. 591; Smith v. Guerre (Tex. Civ. App.) 159 S. W. 417; Grimshaw v. Kent, 67 Kan. 463, 73 Pac. 92; Lamb v. Lamb, 105 Ind. 456, 5 N. E. 171; Williams' Exr. v. Williams, 90 Ky. 28, 13 S. W. 250; Ducker v. Whitson, 112 N. C. 4......
-
Stayton v. Stayton
... ... apprising the jury of the mental condition of deceased at and ... before the execution of the contract." Grimshaw v ... Kent, 67 Kan. 463, 466, 73 P. 92, 93 ... [81 P.2d 6.] ... See, also, Loveless v. Ott, 121 Kan. 728, 250 P ... In ... ...