Grissom v. Department of Revenue
| Decision Date | 24 January 1978 |
| Citation | 241 S.E.2d 517,294 N.C. 183 |
| Parties | Joseph S. GRISSOM v. North Carolina DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Blanchard, Tucker, Twiggs & Denson, for plaintiff.
J. Harold Tharrington, for defendant.
Plaintiff's notice of appeal and petition for discretionary review under GS 7A-31. 34 N.C.App. 381, 238 S.E.2d 311. Petition denied.
Motion of Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question. Allowed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Morris v. Deerfield Episcopal Retirement Community, Inc., No. COA 05-1652 (N.C. App. 10/17/2006), COA 05-1652
...different theory on appeal." Grissom v. Dep't of Revenue, 34 N.C. App. 381, 383, 238 S.E.2d 311, 312-13 (1977), cert. denied, 294 N.C. 183, 241 S.E.2d 517 (1978). Moreover, our Supreme Court has long held that "the law does not permit parties to swap horses between courts in order to get a ......
-
State v. Sutcliff, No. COA06-442 (N.C. App. 2/20/2007)
...theory on appeal," Grissom v. Dept. of Revenue, 34 N.C. App. 381, 383, 238 S.E.2d 311, 312-13 (1977), disc. review denied, 294 N.C. 183, 241 S.E.2d 517 (1978), we find that Defendant has failed to preserve these constitutional questions for appellate review, and has abandoned her argument a......