Gross v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 80,218.
Decision Date | 07 January 2000 |
Docket Number | No. 80,218.,80,218. |
Citation | 994 P.2d 666,26 Kan. App.2d 847 |
Parties | STEPHANIE ANN GROSS, Appellant, v. KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee. |
Court | Kansas Court of Appeals |
Michael S. Holland, of Russell, for appellant.
Brian Cox, of the Kansas Department of Revenue, for appellee.
Before KNUDSON, P.J., ROBERT J. FLEMING, District Judge, assigned, and RICHARD M. SMITH, District Judge, assigned.
Stephanie Ann Gross appeals the trial court's judgment affirming the Kansas Department of Revenue's (KDR) suspension of her driver's license.
During the early morning hours of June 19, 1994, law enforcement officers were conducting a sobriety check lane in Hays, Kansas. As Gross entered the check lane and stopped her vehicle, one of the police officers conducting the sobriety check lane approached her vehicle. The officer's observation of Gross' driving conduct as she approached in the check lane and stopped her vehicle was very limited, and there was nothing about her driving which indicated possible impairment. However, as the officer approached Gross' vehicle, he detected the odor of alcohol and observed a glazed look in Gross' eyes. Gross admitted that she had consumed a few beers.
The officer then asked her to exit the vehicle and perform a field sobriety test. Gross consented and, for the most part, performed the test satisfactorily. Next, even though the officer had not observed any behavior by Gross, in retrieving her driver's license, exiting the vehicle, or her speech, which indicated impairment, the officer asked her to perform a preliminary breath test (PBT). The test was conducted, and the results indicated a probability of excess alcohol concentration. Gross was then arrested for driving under the influence; she was given the implied consent advisory and submitted to a breath test with the Intoxilyzer 5000. The test results were .102.
KDR then suspended Gross' license for failing the test. Gross appealed to the trial court, which affirmed KDR's suspension of Gross' driver's license. This appeal followed.
Gross raises three issues on appeal. First, she contends that the trial court erred in finding that the officer had probable cause to believe she was operating her vehicle while under the influence of alcohol.
City of Dodge City v. Norton, 262 Kan. 199, 203, 936 P.2d 1356 (1997).
We begin our inquiry by examining K.S.A. 1998 Supp. 8-1012. It provides:
"A law enforcement officer may request a person who is operating or attempting to operate a vehicle within this state to submit to a preliminary screening test of the person's breath to determine the alcohol concentration of the person's breath if the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the person: (a) Has alcohol in the person's body."
Probable cause is synonymous with the statutory term "reasonable grounds." Angle v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 12 Kan. App.2d 756, 767, 758 P.2d 226,rev. denied 243 Kan. 777 (1988).
The court's interpretation of a statute is a question of law over which appellate review is unlimited. State v. Donlay, 253 Kan. 132, 133-34, 853 P.2d 680 (1993). We find K.S.A. 1998 Supp. 8-1012 to be clear and unambiguous. It does not, as Gross suggests, require probable cause to believe that she was operating her motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. Rather, it simply provides that the officer must have probable cause to believe that she had alcohol in her body.
Here, the officer...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
City of Wichita v. Molitor
...operating the vehicle under the influence, but rather whether the driver “had alcohol in her body.” Gross v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 26 Kan.App.2d 847, 849, 994 P.2d 666, rev. denied 269 Kan. 932 (2000).Logically, then, an officer's subjective observations that the driver smelled of alcoho......
-
City of Wichita v. Molitor
...operating the vehicle under the influence, but rather whether the driver “had alcohol in her body.” Gross v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 26 Kan.App.2d 847, 849, 994 P.2d 666, rev. denied 269 Kan. 932 (2000). Logically, then, an officer's subjective observations that the driver smelled of alcoh......
-
State v. Jones
...influence of alcohol; thus, this provision in K.S.A. 8-1012 justifying the search is unconstitutional. See Gross v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 26 Kan. App. 2d 847, 849, 994 P.2d 666, rev. denied 269 Kan. 932 (2000) (Probable cause is synonymous with the statutory term "reasonable grounds."). ......
-
State v. Jones, No. 89,658 (KS 2/18/2005)
...influence of alcohol; thus, this provision in K.S.A. 8-1012 justifying the search is unconstitutional. See Gross v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 26 Kan. App. 2d 847, 849, 994 P.2d 666, rev. denied 269 Kan. 932 (2000) (Probable cause is synonymous with the statutory term "reasonable grounds."). ......