Guarino v. Guarino, 82-1902
| Decision Date | 13 April 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. 82-1902,82-1902 |
| Citation | 431 So.2d 189 |
| Parties | Christine M. GUARINO, Appellant, v. Joseph J. GUARINO, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Dennis J. Plews, Bradenton, for appellant.
John J. Waller, St. Petersburg, for appellee.
A final judgment dissolving the marriage of the parties to this appeal was rendered on December 15, 1981. On June 22, 1982, appellant wife filed a motion for contempt against appellee husband alleging the husband's nonpayment of his half of the mortgage payments for four months, nonpayment of one-half of a doctor bill for treatment of the parties' child, and nonpayment of the child support payment due on June 4, 1982. On the same day, the wife filed a motion for alternative relief in the form of a judgment against the husband for the arrearages claimed. After hearing on both motions, the trial court denied the wife's motion for contempt and for judgment for arrearages. After review of the record and the applicable case law, we affirm in part and reverse in part.
The husband admitted that he had failed to pay as additional required child support one-half of the monthly mortgage payment on the marital residence beginning with the March payment and continuing each month thereafter as long as the wife enjoyed exclusive possession of the marital domicile. Payments for the months of March, April, May, and June, 1982, were due and owing at the time of the hearing. Moreover, contrary to the trial court's statement at the hearing and in the order appealed, the transcript of the hearing clearly establishes that the wife testified to the precise amount of the mortgage payment, and her figures were never challenged by the husband.
The law is well established that the right of a wife to payment of child support in arrears is vested, and while it is within the discretion of the court to refrain from holding the husband in contempt for nonpayment, the wife is entitled to enforcement of the payment by legal process. Roffe v. Roffe, 404 So.2d 1095 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Smithwick v. Smithwick, 343 So.2d 945 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Feder v. Feder, 291 So.2d 641 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). Since the husband did not have the present ability to pay the mortgage payments, the trial court acted properly in allowing the husband to reduce the accrued $652.92 arrearage by paying an additional $50 per month. Smithwick. However, the wife is entitled to have the accrued...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Kutz v. Fankhanel
...1st DCA 1987); Kolb v. Kolb, 502 So.2d 518 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Hammond v. Hammond, 492 So.2d 837 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Guarino v. Guarino, 431 So.2d 189 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. dismissed, 441 So.2d 632 (Fla.1983); Fox v. Haislett, 388 So.2d 1261 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Smithwick v. Smithwick, 343 S......
-
Kranz v. Kranz
...to enforcement of the payment by legal process." Puglia v. Puglia, 600 So.2d 484, 485 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), (quoting Guarino v. Guarino, 431 So.2d 189 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. dismissed, 441 So.2d 632 (Fla.1983)). The right to previously determined child support vests at the time the payments are ......
-
Newman v. Newman
...right to payment of child support in arrears. It is a vested property right which the court is required to adjudicate. Guarino v. Guarino, 431 So.2d 189 (Fla. 2d DCA), pet. for rev. dism., 441 So.2d 632 (Fla.1983); Smithwick v. Smithwick, 343 So.2d 945 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Feder v. Feder, 29......
-
Ashe v. Ashe, BN-48
...and necessary. State Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Canady, 473 So.2d 273, 274 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Guarino v. Guarino, 431 So.2d 189 (Fla. 2d DCA), petition for review dismissed, 441 So.2d 632 (Fla.1983); Smithwick v. Smithwick, 343 So.2d 945 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). In othe......