Guerrero v. West 23RD Street Realty, LLC

Decision Date15 November 2007
Docket Number2084.,2083.
Citation2007 NY Slip Op 08881,45 A.D.3d 403,846 N.Y.S.2d 41
PartiesWILLIAM GUERRERO et al., Appellants, v. WEST 23RD STREET REALTY, LLC, et al., Respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

The causes of action for breach of contract were properly dismissed on defendants' CPLR 3211 motion. Even assuming that the agreement for building management services was modified either orally or by the parties' conduct, the modification, which would have permitted automatic renewal for consecutive one-year periods unless terminated by either party upon 60 days' notice prior to the expiration of the term of the agreement, is rendered unenforceable by General Obligations Law § 5-903 (see Harris v Adams & Co. Real Estate, 62 Misc 2d 749, 753 [1970]).

The claim for equitable estoppel was also properly dismissed. To the extent that this claim is based on the alleged renewal of the agreements, it is duplicative of the breach of contract causes of action (see William Kaufman Org. v Graham & James, 269 AD2d 171, 173 [2000]). To the extent that it is based on the expenditures plaintiffs made in preparation for signing a lease, the claim fails because the lease agreement apparently was never reduced to writing (see Youz Films v Just Born, Inc., 69 AD2d 778 [1979] ["the alleged reliance on the oral agreement is no more than the usual situation of parties who orally agree on a deal, intending that there shall be a written contract, and then at the point of signing, one of the parties backs out"]).

We have considered plaintiffs' additional arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Andrias, J.P., Marlow, Williams, Buckley and Malone, JJ.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Healthcare I.Q., LLC v. Chao
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 6, 2014
    ...automatic renewals of contracts for consecutive periods ( see Ovitz, 77 A.D.3d 515, 909 N.Y.S.2d 710;Guerrero v. West 23rd St. Realty, LLC, 45 A.D.3d 403, 846 N.Y.S.2d 41 [1st Dept.2007], lv. denied10 N.Y.3d 707, 858 N.Y.S.2d 654, 888 N.E.2d 396 [2008] ). Since § 5–903 is remedial in nature......
  • Icebox-Scoops, Inc. v. Finanz St. Honore, BV
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • November 16, 2009
    ...only in exceptional circumstances where estoppel is not duplicative of a breach of contract claim, Guerrero v. West 23rd St. Realty, LLC, 45 A.D.3d 403, 404, 846 N.Y.S.2d 41 (1st Dep't 2007), and where one party seeks to compel another to take action that it was not already required to take......
  • Mitsubishi Power Systems Americas, Inc. v. Babcock & Brown Infrastructure Group US, LLC, C.A. No. 4499-VCL (Del. Ch. 1/22/2010)
    • United States
    • Court of Chancery of Delaware
    • January 22, 2010
    ...New York law rejects attempts to repackage breach of contract claims in equitable estoppel guise. See Guerrero v. West 23rd Street Realty, LLC, 846 N.Y.S.2d 41, 42 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007) ("The claim for equitable estoppel was also properly dismissed. . . . [I]t is duplicative of the breach o......
  • Ovitz v. Bloomberg L.P.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 21, 2010
    ...requisite notice to plaintiff that the two-year subscription term was to be automatically renewed ( see Guerrero v. West 23rd St. Realty, LLC, 45 A.D.3d 403, 846 N.Y.S.2d 41 [2007], lv. denied 10 N.Y.3d 707, 858 N.Y.S.2d 654, 888 N.E.2d 396 [2008]; Protection Indus. Corp. v. DDB Needham Wor......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT