Guess v. Linton
Decision Date | 18 November 1930 |
Citation | 236 Ky. 87 |
Parties | Guess v. Linton. |
Court | United States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky |
3. Physicians and Surgeons. — Action against physician or surgeon for negligence or malpractice is barred unless brought within one year from accrual of action (Ky. Stats., sec. 2516).
Appeal from Caldwell Circuit Court.
C.C. GRASSHAM and JOHN W. BLUE, JR., for appellant.
JOHN C. GATES and WHEELER & HUGHES for appellee.
Affirming.
The appellant instituted suit against the appellee seeking to recover damages for an alleged unskillful and negligent operation performed on his hand by appellee. This suit was instituted more than one year after the operation, and the sole question for determination is whether the action was barred under the provisions of section 2516, Ky. Statutes, which provides that such an action must be instituted within one year. It is the contention of appellant that section 2516, Ky. Statutes, is unconstitutional because the act is violative of section 51 of the Constitution. The basis for this contention is that the title to the act did not name both the chapter and the section of statute which it was proposed to amend when section 2516 was amended and re-enacted. It has been so often held by this court that a reference to the particular section to be amended giving the number of the section in Ky. Stats. was a sufficient compliance with section 51 of the Constitution that it is unnecessary to do more than refer to a few of the cases. Board of Penitentiary Commissioners v. Spencer, 159 Ky. 255, 166 S. W. 1017; Morrison v. Com., 197 Ky. 107, 246 S.W. 128; Barnett v. Caldwell, 231 Ky. 514, 21 S.W. (2d) 838; Jefferson County v. Cole, 204 Ky. 27, 263 S.W. 1114
It is feebly contended by appellant that the five-year statute of limitations applies to this kind of action instead of the one-year statute, and the case of Menefee v. Alexander, 107 Ky. 279, 53 S.W. 653, 656, 21 Ky. Law Rep. 980, is cited in support of that contention. The opinion in that case was written prior to the amendment of section 2516, Ky. Stats., which now...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Shaw v. Fox
...Earhart v. Middendorf, 234 Ky. 78, 27 S.W. (2d) 657; Estes v. State Highway Commission, 235 Ky. 86, 29 S. W. (2d) 583; Guess v. Linton, 236 Ky. 87, 32 S.W. (2d) 718; State Board of Health v. Willman, 241 Ky. 835, 45 S.W. (2d) It is not claimed that the act under consideration violates the C......
-
Howard v. Middlesborough Hospital
... ... This ... section 2516 of the statutes, as now so amended, was lately ... considered by this court in the recent case of Guess v ... Linton, 236 Ky. 87, 32 S.W.2d 718, 719, wherein an ... action was brought seeking to recover damages for an alleged ... and unskillful ... ...
-
Howard v. Middlesborough Hospital
...This section 2516 of the statutes, as now so amended, was lately considered by this court in the recent case of Guess v. Linton, 236 Ky. 87, 32 S.W. (2d) 718, 719, wherein an action was brought seeking to recover damages for an alleged and unskillful operation. In this opinion, the court "I......
-
State Athletic Bd. of Control v. Blake Amusement Co.
...the subject-matter of the amendatory act was the same as the subject-matter dealt with in the body of the amended act. In Guess v. Linton, 236 Ky. 87, 32 S.W.2d 718, the of section 2516 of the Kentucky Statutes, as amended by chapter 92 of the Acts of 1916, was involved. The title of the am......