Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Bryant
Decision Date | 05 February 1902 |
Citation | 66 S.W. 804 |
Parties | GULF, C. & S. F. RY. CO. v. BRYANT et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from district court, McLennan county; Marshall Surratt, Judge.
Action by Nettie Bryant and another against the Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals. Reversed.
The statement of the nature and result of the suit is correctly given in appellant's brief as follows:
This suit was instituted by John Bryant against the appellant and the McGregor Cotton Oil Company for personal injuries. Bryant died, and Nettie Bryant, his widow, and Clyde Bryant, his daughter, were substituted as parties plaintiff, and alleged that the injuries received resulted in the death of John Bryant. Appellees admitted that the general demurrer of the cotton oil company was good, and on such admission the court sustained such general demurrer and dismissed the case against that company. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the appellees for $5,000. Appellant moved for a new trial on substantially the same grounds as are assigned as error, which motion was overruled, and this appeal has been properly prosecuted.
Plaintiffs' petition substantially alleged.
The facts show that the deceased was hauling bran for the McGregor Roller Mills, and he was directed by the mill bookkeeper to load a car with bran on defendant's road. He got a wagon load of bran and conveyed it to defendant's road, and was directed by one Dibble, an employé of defendant, on what track he would find a car to load the bran in, which was a switch of defendant's road for use of the McGregor Cotton Oil Company. He selected a car on the switch, and, while unloading his first load, Russell, superintendent of the oil mill, came out where deceased was at work unloading the bran, and spoke to him. Settler, an employé of the road, seemed to be taking the number of the cars, and he also came near where deceased was at work. Deceased was engaged in unloading his second load when the accident occurred. He was using trucks, rolling the sacks of bran back to the end of the car; his wagon standing by the car door, with the horses (two) hitched to the wagon, not tied. He knew it was about time for the local freight train to come in, and looked for it every time he went to the door. He was back in the car when the oil company's employés turned a car loose, and he (his testimony having been taken after suit, but before his death) testified that they (meaning cars) "bumped against my car." He continued: He says on cross: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Applegate v. Quincy
...constructed, as alleged, and that condition occasioned the injuries alleged, defendant would be charged with such negligence. Railroad v. Bryant, 66 S.W. 804; Railroad v. Rodes, 102 S.W. 322; Railroad Farris, 100 S.W. 870; Dooley v. Railroad, 110 S.W. 135. Tateman v. Railroad, 96 Mo.App. 44......
-
Trinity Valley & N. Ry. Co. v. Scholz
...S. F. Ry. Co. v. Miller, 98 Tex. 270, 83 S. W. 182; Ray v. Pecos Ry. Co., 35 Tex. Civ. App. 123, 80 S. W. 112; G., C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Bryant, 30 Tex. Civ. App. 4, 66 S. W. 804; Railway Co. v. Underwood, 67 Tex. 592, 4 S. W. 216; Railway Co. v. Moody, 71 Tex. 616, 9 S. W. 465; Railway Co.......
-
Texas Interurban Ry. Co. v. Hughes
...Co. v. Miller, 98 Tex. 270, 83 S. W. 182; Ray v. Pecos, & N. T. R. Co., 35 Tex. Civ. App. 123, 80 S. W. 112; Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co. v. Bryant, 30 Tex. Civ. App. 4, 66 S. W. 804; International & G. N. Railway Co. v. Underwood, 67 Tex. 592, 4 S. W. 216; International & G. N. Railway Co. v. M......
-
Midland Valley R. Co. v. Toomer
...94 N.W. 289; I. C. R. Co. v. Kanouse, 39 Ill. 272, 89 Am. Dec. 307; T., P. & W. R. Co. v. Rumbold, 40 Ill. 143; G., C. & S. F. v. Bryant et al., 30 Tex. Civ. App. 4, 66 S.W. 804; Penn. Co. & Penn. R. Co. v. Greso, 79 Ill. App. 127; Smith, Adm'r, v. C. & E. I. R. Co. et al., 163 Ill. App. 47......