Gustinger v. H.J.R., Inc., 88-1327
| Decision Date | 05 February 1991 |
| Docket Number | No. 88-1327,88-1327 |
| Citation | 573 So.2d 1033,16 Fla. L. Weekly 389 |
| Parties | 16 Fla. L. Weekly 389 Alfred GUSTINGER, Jr., as personal representative of the Estate of Ernest A. Cole, and as personal representative of the Estate of Meredith Cole, Appellant, v. H.J.R., INC., f/k/a Ross Associates Inc., a division of Baymont Corp., Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Spence, Payne Masington, Grossman & Needle, Podhurst, Orseck, Parks, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow & Olin, and Joel S. Perwin, Walton Lantaff Schroeder and Carson, Miami, for appellant.
Kubicki, Bradley, Draper, Gallagher & McGrane, and Betsy E. Gallagher and Jon Derrevere, Miami, for appellee.
Before FERGUSON, COPE and LEVY, JJ.
Ernest and Meredith Cole were killed instantly when their car was broadsided by a police car responding, at 70 m.p.h., to an emergency call. The personal representative brought this wrongful death action against the Florida Department of Transportation (DOT) and the road construction engineer and contractor, H.J. Ross Associates, Inc., and H.J. Ross Associates. This appeal is brought from a final summary judgment entered in favor of Ross.
The dispositive issue on appeal is whether Ross established conclusively, for the purpose of a summary judgment, that its duties as a general contractor, regarding the design and construction of certain improvements to State Road 94 (Kendall Drive) in Dade County, were extinguished under the doctrine of Slavin v. Kay, 108 So.2d 462 (Fla.1958) (), by the Department of Transportation's acceptance of the project with knowledge of potential hazards to motorists.
After the tragic accident that took the lives of the Coles, further investigations by traffic engineers at the crash site established a "line-of-sight" defect as a contributing cause. The defect is a four-foot rise of Kendall Drive as it crosses over railroad tracks. That slight elevation obscures the vision of westbound motorists approaching 98th Court at the posted speed limit.
Two material issues raised by the pleadings are whether the defect was patent, that is, whether it was obvious to the Department of Transportation, Easterday v. Masiello, 518 So.2d 260 (Fla.1988), and if not, whether the Department otherwise knew, or should have known, of the dangerous defect. Having...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Valiente v. R.J. Behar & Co.
...have been patent. Ed Ricke & Sons, Inc. v. Green, 609 So.2d 504, 507 (Fla. 1992) ; Plaza, 971 So.2d at 925 ; Gustinger v. H.J.R., Inc., 573 So.2d 1033, 1034 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).When the Jatropha Hastata shrubs were planted, they were approximately five feet tall and two and one-half feet wid......
-
Plaza v. Fisher Development, Inc.
...concluding that "[t]he record establishes that the pool of hot water in this case was a patent defect"); Gustinger v. H.J.R., Inc., 573 So.2d 1033, 1034 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (affirming entry of summary judgment in favor of construction company where the Department of Transportation knew or sh......
-
Transp. Eng'g, Inc. v. Cruz
...guard or kill switch because company accepted completed project containing patent defects as a matter of law); Gustinger v. H.J.R., Inc., 573 So.2d 1033, 1034 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (affirming summary judgment for contractor that designed and constructed road improvements for DOT because eviden......
-
Mcintosh ex rel. Mcintosh v. Progressive Design & Eng'g, Inc.
...vitality. It has applied it to shield a design engineer and architects. See Easterday, 518 So. 2d at 260; Gustinger v. H.J.R., Inc., 573 So. 2d 1033, 1033-34 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). Other Florida courts have applied Slavin in road construction scenarios. See Chadbourne, 491 So. 2d at 552-54 (ap......