Guy v. State, s. 85-1120
| Decision Date | 28 June 1985 |
| Docket Number | Nos. 85-1120,85-1121,s. 85-1120 |
| Parties | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1617 Barry Allen GUY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Ben Kay of Ben Kay, P.A., Sarasota, for petitioner.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for respondent.
The court below refused to adjudge petitioner partially indigent for the purpose of obtaining discovery costs because petitioner's mother has retained private counsel to represent petitioner. Petitioner has filed separate petitions for writ of prohibition and certiorari challenging the trial court's order, and they were consolidated for consideration. We grant the petition for writ of certiorari and quash the order of the trial court, because the order constitutes a departure from the essential requirements of law. The petition for writ of prohibition is denied because it seeks an improper remedy.
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.111(b)(4) states:
(4) "Indigent" as used herein shall mean a person who is unable to pay for the services of an attorney, including costs of investigation, without substantial hardship to himself or his family; "partially indigent" as used herein shall mean a person unable to pay more than a portion of the fee charged by an attorney, including costs of investigation, without substantial hardship to himself or his family.
A finding of indigency is based upon only the defendant's financial status. The fact that friends or family members retain private counsel to represent a defendant does not deprive him of his right to be declared indigent in order that costs may be taxed against the county under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220(K). See Price v. Mounts, 421 So.2d 690 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), and Johnson v. Snyder, 417 So.2d 783 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
The trial court should rule on petitioner's motion to be declared partially indigent based upon his own financial ability to pay.
Petition for writ of certiorari GRANTED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Vera v. State, 95-03491
...friend who had posted his bond. However, the trial court should only have considered Vera's financial ability to pay. See Guy v. State, 473 So.2d 234 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). Further, a defendant may not be presumed to have waived the right to assistance of counsel absent a Faretta 1 inquiry to ......
-
Leon County v. Harmon, 91-3271
...questions have been addressed and answered by our sister courts in Thompson v. State, 525 So.2d 1011 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), Guy v. State, 473 So.2d 234 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985), Price v. Mounts, 421 So.2d 690 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), Saintil v. Snyder, 417 So.2d 784 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), and Johnson v. Sn......
-
Lee v. State, 4D99-3527.
...4th DCA 1982); Saintil v. Snyder, 417 So.2d 784 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Johnson v. Snyder, 417 So.2d 783 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Guy v. State, 473 So.2d 234 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)(holding that the county is required to pay the reasonable costs of defending an indigent defendant represented by a private......
-
Thompson v. State, 87-2197
...of discovery. Moreover, the fact that his family had retained private counsel to represent him cannot change this result. Guy v. State, 473 So.2d 234 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Price v. Mounts, 421 So.2d 690 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Johnson v. Snyder, 417 So.2d 783 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Saintil v. Snyde......