Guzman v. St. Francis Hospital, Inc.

Decision Date02 May 2000
Docket NumberNo. 98-2710.,98-2710.
Citation609 N.W.2d 166,2000 WI 34,234 Wis.2d 170
PartiesAudrey GUZMAN, Nicanor Guzman, Jessica Guzman, a minor, and Steven Guzman, a minor, by their Guardian ad Litem, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL, INC., American Continental Insurance Company and Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund, Defendants-Appellants, ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL, Defendant-Third-Party Plaintiff, James SULLIVAN, M.D., Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Richard Fitzpatrick, M.D., and Southeastern Emergency Medical Services, S.C., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants, XY & Z INSURANCE COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant.
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

For defendants-appellants, St. Francis Hospital, Inc. and American Continental Insurance Company, there were briefs (in the court of appeals) by John A. Nelson, Timothy W. Feeley and von Briesen, Purtell & Roper, S.C., Milwaukee.

For defendant-appellant, Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund, there were briefs (in the court of appeals) by Steven J. Caulum and Bell, Gierhart & Moore, S.C., Madison, and William H. Levit, Jr., Michael B. Apfeld, and Godfrey & Kahn, S.C., Milwaukee, and oral argument by Michael B. Apfeld.

For the third-party defendant-appellant, James Sullivan, M.D., there were briefs (in the court of appeals) by Paul Kelly, Amy Doyle and Schellinger & Doyle, S.C., Waukesha.

For the third-party defendant-appellant, Richard Fitzpatrick, M.D., there were briefs (in the court of appeals) by Lori Gendelman, Jeffrey J.P. Conta and Otjen, Van Ert, Lieb & Weir, S.C., Milwaukee.

For the third-party defendant-appellant, Southeastern Emergency Medical Services, S.C., there were briefs (in the court of appeals) by Mary Lee Ratzel, Peter F. Mullaney and Peterson, Johnson & Murray, S.C., Milwaukee. For the third-party defendants-appellants there was oral argument by John S. Skilton and Foley and Lardner, Madison.

For the plaintiffs-respondents there was a brief (in the court of appeals) by Ted M. Warshafsky and Warshafsky, Rotter, Tarnoff, Reinhardt & Bloch, S.C., Milwaukee, and Edward E. Robinson and Cannon & Dunphy, S.C., of counsel, Brookfield, and oral argument by Ted M. Warshafsky.

An amicus curiae brief was filed by David M. Skoglind and Aiken & Scoptur, S.C., Milwaukee, on behalf of the Wisconsin Academy of Trial Lawyers.

An amicus curiae brief was filed by Richard H. Middleton, Jr., Ned Miltenberg, and the Association of Trial Lawyers of America, Washington, D.C., and Merrick R. Domnitz and Domnitz, Mawicke & Goisman, S.C., Milwaukee, on behalf of the Association of Trial Lawyers of America.

¶ 1. PER CURIAM.

The court is equally divided on whether to affirm or reverse the order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County. Chief Justice Abrahamson, Justices Bablitch and Bradley would affirm. Justices Wilcox, Crooks and Sykes would reverse. Justice Prosser did not participate.

[1]

¶ 2. When a certification or bypass results in a tie vote by this court, the better course of action is to vacate our decision to accept certification or bypass and remand the cause to the court of appeals. State v. Richard Knutson, Inc., ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • New Richmond News v. City of New Richmond
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • 18 d5 Dezembro d5 2015
    ...P. Wilcox did not participate.... [W]e vacate our order granting certification and remand to the court of appeals.").7. Guzman v. St. Francis Hosp., Inc., 2000 WI 34, ¶¶ 1, 3, 234 Wis.2d 170, 609 N.W.2d 166 ("The court is equally divided on whether to affirm or reverse the order of the circ......
  • Guzman v. St. Francis Hospital, Inc.
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Court of Appeals
    • 19 d2 Dezembro d2 2000
    ...three to three (Justice Prosser not participating) on whether to affirm or reverse the circuit court's nonfinal order. Guzman v. St. Francis Hosp., Inc., 2000 WI 34, ¶ 1, 234 Wis. 2d 170, 609 N.W.2d 166. Consequently, the supreme court vacated its order granting the petition to bypass and r......
  • Smith v. Kleynerman
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • 21 d2 Março d2 2017
    ...review).80. State v. Longcore , 2000 WI 23, 233 Wis.2d 278, 607 N.W.2d 620 (on petition for review).81. Guzman v. St. Francis Hosp., Inc. , 2000 WI 34, 234 Wis.2d 170, 609 N.W.2d 166 (on bypass).82. State v. Strong , 2000 WI 50, 235 Wis.2d 379, 611 N.W.2d 457 (on petition for review).83. Po......
  • Ferdon v. Wisconsin Patients Comp. Fund
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • 14 d4 Julho d4 2005
    ...613 N.W.2d 120. 35. Id., s 2. 36. Id., s 30. 37. Id., s 31 (quoted source omitted). 38. Id. 39. Wis. Stat. § 809.60. 40. Guzman v. St. Francis Hosp., Inc., 2000 WI 34, s 3, 234 Wis. 2d 170, 609 N.W.2d 41. Id., s 5. 42. Id., ss 7-12. 43. Id., s 18. 44. Id., ss 22-25. 45. Id., ss 13-17. 46. I......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT