Guzman v. State, 43351

Decision Date31 December 1970
Docket NumberNo. 43351,43351
Citation461 S.W.2d 602
PartiesRudolph G. GUZMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
CourtTexas Court of Criminal Appeals

Thomas A. Autry, Austin, for appellant.

Bob Smith, Dist. atty., and Lawrence Wells, Asst. Dist. Atty., Austin, and Jim D. Vollers, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is the possession of heroin; the punishment, seventeen (17) years.

Trial was before the court without the intervention of a jury.

Appellant's first ground of error is that the search warrant did not name him. Hernandez v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 437 S.W.2d 831, disposes of this contention adversely to the appellant.

His second ground of error is that since the appellant committed no act which aroused the suspicions of the officers after they entered the house, the officers were without authority to search his person. Johnson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 440 S.W.2d 308 is authority authorizing the search of the appellant.

It should be noted also that the arresting officer stated that he always searched persons found in a narcotic raid for firearms and that his search of the appellant's pants pocket, in which he found the package of narcotics, was in the course of his frisk for weapons.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Lippert v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • February 1, 1984
    ...the warrant. Hernandez v. State, 437 S.W.2d 831 (Tex.Cr.App.1968); Johnson v. State, 440 S.W.2d 308 (Tex.Cr.App.1969); Guzman v. State, 461 S.W.2d 602 (Tex.Cr.App.1970); Guerra v. State, 496 S.W.2d 92 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Brown v. State, 498 S.W.2d 343 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Martinez v. State, 50......
  • People v. Finn
    • United States
    • New York City Court
    • January 8, 1973
    ...they endanger both themselves and the search they are making.' Also: Samuel v. State, 222 So.2d 3 (Florida, 1969); Guzman v. State, 461 S.W.2d 602 (Texas Cr.App., 1970); Willis v. State, 122 Ga.App. 455, 177 S.E.2d 487 (Georgia, 1970). In applying the foregoing principles, we necessarily ar......
  • Conner v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • June 11, 1986
    ...the warrant. Hernandez v. State, 437 S.W.2d 831 (Tex.Cr.App.1968); Johnson v. State, 440 S.W.2d 308 (Tex.Cr.App.1969); Guzman v. State, 461 S.W.2d 602 (Tex.Cr.App.1970); Fisher v. State, 493 S.W.2d 841 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Guerra v. State, 496 S.W.2d 92 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Brown v. State, 498 ......
  • Colding v. State, CR75--203
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • May 3, 1976
    ...cert. denied, 415 U.S. 975, 94 S.Ct. 1559, 39 L.Ed.2d 870; State v. De Simone, 60 N.J. 319, 288 A.2d 849 (1972); Guzman v. State, 461 S.W.2d 602 (Tex.Cr.App.1970); Samuel v. State, 222 So.2d 3 (Fla.1969); Hernandez v. State, 437 S.W.2d 831 (Tex.Cr.App.1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 987, 89 S......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT