H-C Health Services, Inc. v. Board of Assessors of South Hadley

Decision Date12 May 1997
Docket NumberNo. 96-P-856,H-C,96-P-856
PartiesHEALTH SERVICES, INC., & another 1 v. BOARD OF ASSESSORS OF SOUTH HADLEY.
CourtAppeals Court of Massachusetts

Further Appellate Review Denied July 3, 1997.

Alan Seewald, Amherst, for defendant.

David R. Baron, Boston, for plaintiffs.

Before ARMSTRONG, GILLERMAN and LENK, JJ.

GILLERMAN, Justice.

The board of assessors of South Hadley (town) appeals from the decision of the Appellate Tax Board (ATB) granting abatements of taxes for the years 1992 and 1993 on real estate and personal property assessed to H-C Health Services, Inc., and Falls Nursing Home, Inc. (together referred to as the appellees).

The appellees are each organized as business corporations under the provisions of G.L. c. 156B. The ATB ruled (I) that to qualify for the charitable exemption under G.L. c. 59, § 5, Third, 2 a corporation need not be organized under G.L. c. 180 and (ii) that "for purposes of qualification for exemption under G.L. c. 59, § 5, [Third], a functional test is applied, and reference is made to the language of its charter or articles of organization, its by-laws, the objects which it serves, and its declared purposes and the work performed by it." We take these rulings to mean that the operative corporate documents and the actual operations of the appellees were determined by the ATB to have qualified as a "charitable organization" for purposes of c. 59, § 5, Third. 3

The town challenges these rulings, arguing that the appellees are not entitled to the charitable exemption from local property taxes because of their incorporation under G.L. c. 156B which, inter alia, permits the distribution of assets to stockholders. The issues presented do not appear to have been the subject of any previously reported appellate decision.

We summarize the facts, none of which is challenged by the town in its brief.

H-C Health Services, Inc., owns and operates a 120-bed licensed nursing home in South Hadley. The population at the nursing home is predominantly Medicaid patients. All the issued and outstanding shares of the capital stock are owned by a charitable corporation organized and existing under the provisions of G.L. c. 180. The primary purpose of the corporation, as stated in its "Restated Articles of Organization," is to operate, and provide services to, residential or day-care facilities for elderly or infirm persons. Its articles also provide that the corporation intends that it be entitled to an exemption from Federal income taxes by qualifying as a charitable corporation under the provisions of § 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended. Thus, the articles also provide that no part of its assets or earnings may enure to the private benefit of any individual or legal entity, and that upon liquidation or dissolution its assets shall be distributed only to a § 501(c)(3) organization. The corporation has been granted § 501(c)(3) status by the Internal Revenue Service, and it has received a sales tax exemption certificate from the Commonwealth's Department of Revenue.

The corporate characteristics of Falls Nursing Home, Inc., are identical to those of H-C Health Services, Inc. Prior to its present inactive status, it also operated a nursing home in South Hadley predominantly for medicare and medicaid patients.

Discussion. The text of the third clause of § 5 does not support the town's appeal. The exemption from the local tax on personal property is available to a "charitable organization" if it is "incorporated in the commonwealth." The exemption for the local tax on real estate is available where the real estate is either "owned by or held in trust for a charitable organization." Nowhere does the statute provide that, in order to qualify as a charitable organization, the taxpayer must be incorporated under c. 180. Further, the ATB found, as we have said, that the corporate documents, and the actual operations of the appellees, were such as to qualify the appellees as "charitable organizations."

There is no reason to import the provisions of c. 180 to identify the circumstances under which the exemption provided in G.L. c. 59, § 5, Third, is not available. Subparagraph (a), quoted in note 2, supra, performs that task: any distribution of assets for private benefit is a disqualifying event. No such disqualification is present in this case; see note 5, infra. Moreover, "an entity may be treated as charitable for one purpose and not for another." Attorney Gen. v. Weymouth Agric. & Indus. Soc., 400 Mass. 475, 477 n. 3, 509 N.E.2d 1193 (1987) (citing cases holding that Boston Symphony Orchestra is subject to local property tax but is entitled to the charitable immunity). The issue is solely whether the appellees are "charitable organizations" for the purpose of the exemption from local property taxes.

The ATB's "functional test" for the determination of the availability of the third clause's exemption has been approved by the Supreme Judicial Court. In Assessors of Boston v. Vincent Club, 351 Mass. 10, 12, 217 N.E.2d 757 (1966), the court held that whether a taxpayer is a charitable organization qualified under the third clause depends upon "the language of its charter or articles of association, constitution and by-laws, and upon the objects which it serves and the method of its administration ... [o]r, as otherwise expressed, upon the declared purposes and the actual work performed." Nowhere is there any intimation in this passage that what matters is the chapter of the General Laws under which the taxpayer was organized. 4 See also Harvard Community Health Plan, Inc. v. Assessors of Cambridge, 384 Mass. 536, 541, 427 N.E.2d 1159 (1981) ("Exemption is extended to the real property of a corporation with charitable purposes, provided it is occupied by the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • St. Joseph's Living Ctr. v. Town of Windham
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • March 24, 2009
    ...v. Bridgeport, supra, 270 Conn. at 86, 851 A.2d 277 ("a corporation's charter reveals its purpose"); H-C Health Services, Inc. v. Board of Assessors, 42 Mass.App. 596, 599, 678 N.E.2d 1339 ("whether a taxpayer is a charitable organization ... depends upon the language of its charter or arti......
  • North American Expositions v. Corcoran
    • United States
    • Appeals Court of Massachusetts
    • October 5, 2007
    ...charitable organization, "is how the organization describes itself, and what in fact it does." H-C Health Servs., Inc. v. Assessors of S. Hadley, 42 Mass.App.Ct. 596, 599, 678 N.E.2d 1339 (1997). The expressed purpose of the Foundation is to distribute the Fund "for the benefit of the South......
  • Cfm Buckley/North v. Board of Greenfield
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • March 16, 2009
    ...rather than the form of organization, should determine application of the exemption. See H-C Health Servs., Inc. v. Assessors of S. Hadley, 42 Mass.App.Ct. 596, 678 N.E.2d 1339 (1997). The functional test, however, cannot be used to supplant the express statutory requirement of incorporatio......
  • Lasell Village v. Bd. of Assessors of Newton, 05-P-528.
    • United States
    • Appeals Court of Massachusetts
    • September 21, 2006
    ...See New England Legal Foundation v. Boston, 423 Mass. 602, 610, 670 N.E.2d 152 (1996); H-C Health Servs., Inc. v. Assessors of S. Hadley, 42 Mass.App.Ct. 596, 599, 678 N.E.2d 1339 (1997). "[A]n educational institution of a public charitable nature falls within" the exemption provided by the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT