H & L Equipment, Inc. v. Schardt, 83-327
| Decision Date | 22 June 1984 |
| Docket Number | No. 83-327,83-327 |
| Citation | 349 N.W.2d 924,217 Neb. 653 |
| Parties | H & L EQUIPMENT, INC., Appellee, v. Verland SCHARDT, Appellant. |
| Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
Lyle J. Koenig and Frank J. Daley, Jr., of Germer, Loenig, Murray, Johnson & Daley, Hebron, for appellant.
Ted S. Griess of Baird & Griess, Sutton, and Stephen A. Scherr of Whelan, Foote & Scherr, P.C., Hastings, for appellee.
H & L Equipment, Inc., sued Verland Schardt in an action alternatively seeking replevin of a used truck scale or damages regarding sale of the scale. In addition to his answer to H & L's petition, Schardt counterclaimed, alleging, generally, H & L's nonperformance of the sales contract, and seeking consequential damages regarding the sale. There was evidence adduced by each party in support of their respective contentions. A recital of the conflicting evidence serves no purpose. The trial court resolved the conflict of evidence in favor of H & L, and entered judgment in favor of H & L for replevin and against Schardt on consequential damages regarding the sale. In a law action tried to the court, the findings of the trial court have the effect of a jury verdict and will not be disturbed on appeal unless clearly wrong. In a nonjury law action the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the successful party, with conflicts resolved in favor of the successful party, who is entitled to the benefit of every inference which can be reasonably deduced from the evidence. See White v. Medico Life Ins. Co., 212 Neb. 901, 327 N.W.2d 606 (1982). There is evidence to support the trial court's findings. The findings of the trial court are not clearly wrong. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Alliance Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. State Sur. Co.
...in favor of the successful party, who is entitled to every reasonable inference deducible from the evidence. See, H & L Equip. v. Schardt, 217 Neb. 653, 349 N.W.2d 924 (1984); Havelock Bank v. Woods, State Surety issued a motor vehicle dealer's bond for Fred Arntt, a used-car dealer doing b......
-
Mike Pratt & Sons, Inc. v. Metalcraft, Inc.
...215 Neb. 604, 340 N.W.2d 369 (1983). See, also, Schmode's, Inc. v. Wilkinson, 219 Neb. 209, 361 N.W.2d 557 (1985); H & L Equip. v. Schardt, 217 Neb. 653, 349 N.W.2d 924 (1984). Unless we are able to say as a matter of law that there is no evidence to support the district court's decision, w......
- Jershin v. Becker
-
Lis v. Moser Well Drilling & Service, Inc.
...by this court unless they are clearly wrong. Schmode's, Inc. v. Wilkinson, 219 Neb. 209, 361 N.W.2d 557 (1985); H & L Equip. v. Schardt, 217 Neb. 653, 349 N.W.2d 924 (1984). Moser contends that its undertaking was only to acidize the well, which it did. The county court in effect found that......