Haberlil v. City of Boston
Decision Date | 28 February 1906 |
Citation | 190 Mass. 358,76 N.E. 907 |
Parties | HABERLIL v. CITY OF BOSTON. |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Jas E. Cotter and Jos. P. Fagan, for plaintiff.
Arthur L. Spring, Asst. Corp. Counsel, for defendant.
The first question is whether the voting booth was lawfully in the public street. It was a one-story structure, 25 feet long, about 10 feet wide, and it was placed within the traveled part of the street; one side of it resting upon the curbstone of the sidewalk, and the remainder extending out into the street. The defendant relies upon Rev. Laws, c. 11 § 186, which, so far as material, reads as follows: This is a general law applicable throughout the commonwealth, except that in Boston this power is vested in the board of election commissioners of that city, instead of the mayor and aldermen.
In construing this statute, it is to be noted that there is no language explicitly providing that a polling place may be located in a street. The natural and easy reading of the language is that this polling place is to be located in a building, and consequently in a place where buildings generally are located, namely, not in the traveled part of a street, but outside the limits of the street, or at least outside the part worked for public travel. It is to be further noted that the possibility is contemplated that the officers charged with this duty may be unable to find in a precinct a suitable polling place, and in such case a polling place may be designated in an adjoining precinct. This possibility scarcely could arise if it were contemplated that the polling place could be located upon the traveled part of a street or highway. The...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Stoliker v. City of Boston
... ... timber, put up in the manner that it was, could be found to ... be a defect in the way. Griffin v. Boston, 182 Mass ... 409, 65 N.E. 811, and cases cited; Bennett v ... Everett, 191 Mass. 364, 368, 77 N.E. 886; Davis v ... Charlton, 140 Mass. 422, 5 N.E. 473; Haberlil v ... Boston, 190 Mass. 358, 76 N.E. 907, 4 L. R. A. (N. S.) ... 571. This obstruction had been put in the street with the ... consent and under the authority of the city, by virtue of a ... contract made by it with Kiley; the obstruction had remained ... there a considerable time, although ... ...
-
Stoliker v. City of Boston
...cited; Bennett v. Everett, 191 Mass. 364, 368, 77 N. E. 886;Davis v. Charlton, 140 Mass. 422, 5 N. E. 473;Haberlil v. Boston, 190 Mass. 358, 76 N. E. 907,4 L. R. A. (N. S.) 571. This obstruction had been put in the street with the consent and under the authority of the city, by virtue of a ......
- Com. v. Caldwell
-
Commonwealth v. Morrison
... ... The ... defendant is complained of for obstructing a highway in the ... city of Boston. The facts are that the defendant kept a lunch ... wagon upon a public way, known as ... was fairly comprehended within the description of travel upon ... the highway. Haberlil v. Boston, 190 Mass. 358, 76 ... N.E. 907, 4 L. R. A. (N. S.) 571. It may well be that the ... ...