Hack v. Great American Ins. Co.
| Citation | 175 So.2d 594 |
| Decision Date | 01 June 1965 |
| Docket Number | No. 64-951,64-951 |
| Parties | M. D. HACK, Appellant, v. GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Green & Hastings and Irma Robbins Feder, Miami, for appellant.
Wicker, Smith, Blomqvist, Hinckley & Davant, Miami, for appellee.
Before CARROLL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff below from a summary final judgment. The parties will be referred to as in the trial court.
The plaintiff was involved in an accident with an uninsured motorist while using his brother's automobile with permission and consent. The brother was not a party to the litigation, but was the owner of the automobile which was insured under a family automobile policy by the defendant. The policy contained several types of insurance, including 'Part II--Expenses for Medical Services' and 'Part IV--Protection Against Uninsured Motorists', for which separate premiums had been paid.
Plaintiff made a claim against the defendant for coverage under the Uninsured Motorist clause for bodily injury. The claim was arbitrated and resulted in an award to the plaintiff, which was then paid by the defendant. Thereafter, the plaintiff made demand upon defendant for payment of medical bills which were incurred as a result of the accident under the Medical Payments coverage clause. This demand was rejected by defendant and plaintiff filed suit, requesting judgment for medical expenses incurred and attorney's fees.
The defendant filed an answer, which contained no affirmative defenses, denying each and every allegation of the complaint. The plaintiff moved for a summary judgment in the amount of $842.05, which was the total amount of medical bills incurred as a result of the accident. Defendant filed its motion for summary judgment and in the alternative to limit damages, together with affidavits indicating that the arbitration award was paid and that in the arbitration hearing, (under the Uninsured Motorist clause), the medical bills and reports were entered into evidence and considered in arriving at the final award. The trial court denied the motion for summary judgment, but granted the motion to limit the damages for the medical expenses which had been incurred since the hearing before the arbitrator.
Based on the previous order, the plaintiff then filed its motion for summary judgment, seeking judgment in the sum of $165.00 (the amount of the medical bills since the hearing), and a summary final judgment was granted for that amount. In addition, an award of $150.00 was granted as reasonable attorney's fees to the plaintiff's attorney for abtaining a judgment in his favor for the sum of $165.00.
Plaintiff questions the order limiting the damages to $165.00 and the amount of the attorney's fees, contending that the judgment should be for all the medical expenses incurred as a result of the accident.
The material portions of the defendant's family automobile policy involved herein are as follows:
* * *
* * *
'PART II--EXPENSES FOR MEDICAL SERVICES
'COVERAGE C--MEDICAL PAYMENTS. To pay all reasonable expenses incurred within one year from the date of accident for necessary medical, surgical * * * services:
* * *
* * *
'DIVISION 2. To or for any other person who sustains bodily injury, caused by accident, while occupying:
'(a) the owned automobile, while being used by the named insured, by any resident of the same household or by any other person with the permission of the named insured; * * *
* * *
* * *
'PART IV--PROTECTION AGAINST UNINSURED MOTORISTS
'COVERAGE J--FAMILY PROTECTION (DAMAGES FOR BODILY INJURY). To pay all sums which the insured or his legal representative shall be legally entitled to recover as damages from the owner or operator of an uninsured automobile because of bodily injury, * * * sustained by the insured, caused by accident and arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of such uninsured automobile; provided, for the purposes of this coverage, determination as to whether the insured or such representative is legally entitled to recover such damages, and if so the amount thereof, shall be made by agreement between the insured or such representative and the company or, if they fail to agree, by arbitration.
'DEFINITIONS. The definitions under Part I, except the definition of 'insured', apply to Part IV, and under Part IV:
"insured' means:
'(a) the named insured and any relative;
'(b) any other person while occupying an insured automobile; * * *'
* * *
* * *
The plaintiff contends that ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Linn v. North Idaho Dist. Medical Service Bureau, Inc., 12861
...of one or two of those authorities mentioned in Boroo is both illustrative and helpful.In both Hack v. Great American Insurance Co., 175 So.2d 594, 596 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1965), and Sims v. Nat'l Casualty Co., 171 So.2d 399, 400 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1965), the Florida court recognized that "the m......
-
Booth v. Seaboard Fire & Marine Insurance Company
...Accident Ins. Co. v. Gavin (Fla.App.), 184 So. 2d 229; Sims v. National Casualty Co. (Fla.App.), 171 So.2d 399; Hack v. Great American Ins. Co. (Fla.App.), 175 So.2d 594." 156 N.W.2d at 139. Many states have upheld this provision. See e. g. Niekamp v. Allstate Ins. Co., 52 Ill.App.2d 364, 2......
-
Stephens v. Allied Mut. Ins. Co.
...Accident Ins. Co. v. Gavin (Fla.App.), 184 So.2d 229; Sims v. National Casualty Co. (Fla.App.), 171 So.2d 399; Hack v. Great American Ins. Co. (Fla.App.), 175 So.2d 594. We therefore hold that a provision in an automobile liability policy that an insurer shall not be obligated to pay under ......
-
Greenspan v. Travelers Ins. Co.
...Co. (201 So.2d 529 (La.App., 1967) (Feit v. St. Paul Fire & Mar. Ins. Co., 209 Cal.App.2d 825, 27 Cal.Rptr. 870); Hack v. Great Amer. Ins. Co., 175 So.2d 594 (Fla.App., 1965); American Ind. Co. v. Olesijuk, 353 S.W.2d 71 (Tex.Civ.App., 1962); Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schilansky, 176 A.2d......