Hackett v. Paluck
Decision Date | 21 November 2012 |
Citation | 100 A.D.3d 898,953 N.Y.S.2d 897,2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 08008 |
Parties | In the Matter of Barbara HACKETT, respondent, v. Michael PALUCK, appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
The Law Offices of Richard J. DaVolio, P.C., Patchogue, N.Y., for appellant.
Anthony M. Bramante, Brooklyn, N.Y., for respondent.
In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an amended order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Kent, J.), dated January 24, 2012, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Watson, S.M.), dated September 6, 2011, which, inter alia, after a hearing, and upon the parties' consent, directed the entry of a money judgment in favor of the mother and against him in the principal sum of $29,445.61.
ORDERED that the amended order dated January 24, 2012, is affirmed, with costs.
The Family Court properly denied the father's objections to the order dated September 6, 2011, as that order was entered upon the consent of the parties ( see Matter of Cabral v. Cabral, 61 A.D.3d 863, 878 N.Y.S.2d 389;Matter of Bien–Aime–Schneider v. Schneider, 5 A.D.3d 763, 773 N.Y.S.2d 617;Matter of Proulx v. Ardito, 289 A.D.2d 581, 735 N.Y.S.2d 789;Matter of Benerofe v. Wechsler, 281 A.D.2d 476, 477, 721 N.Y.S.2d 783).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Gonzalez
...A.D.3d 921953 N.Y.S.2d 8972012 N.Y. Slip Op. 08031The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,v.Juan GONZALEZ, appellant.Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.Nov. 21, Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (A. Alexander Donn of counsel), for appellant.Richard A. Brown, District Attorney......
-
Comoletti v. Papapietro
...A.D.3d 711, 711, 38 N.Y.S.3d 435 ; Matter of Herczegh v. Capolino, 140 A.D.3d 957, 958, 32 N.Y.S.3d 512 ; Matter of Hackett v. Paluck, 100 A.D.3d 898, 899, 953 N.Y.S.2d 897 ; Matter of Cabral v. Cabral, 61 A.D.3d 863, 864, 878 N.Y.S.2d 389 ). To the extent that the father contends that he c......
- George v. Neville
- Herczegh v. Capolino