Hadi v. Cordero

Decision Date06 December 2006
Docket NumberNo. 3D06-2604.,No. 3D06-2620.,No. 3D06-2603.,No. 33D06-2605.,3D06-2620.,33D06-2605.,3D06-2604.,3D06-2603.
Citation955 So.2d 17
PartiesLucy D. HADI, Secretary, Florida Department of Children and Families, Petitioner, v. Enrique CORDERO, Daniel Fontecha and Eugene Roman, Respondents.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Valerie Jonas and John Eddy Morrison, Assistant Public Defenders; Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General and Richard L. Polin, Assistant Attorney General; Katherine Fernandez Rundle, State Attorney and Angelica D. Zayas, Assistant State Attorney; Murray A. Greenberg, Miami-Dade County Attorney and Robert A. Duvall, Assistant County Attorney; Linda Kelly Kearson, General Counsel, Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, for respondents.

Before FLETCHER, SHEPHERD, and SUAREZ, JJ.

SUAREZ, J.

The Florida Department of Children and Families ("DCF") petitions this court for writs of prohibition or, in the alternative, certiorari, to quash the orders of three circuit court judges. Each order under review grants respondents' petitions for writ of mandamus and directs DCF to take physical custody of respondents, each of whom has been declared mentally incompetent to stand trial, and places them in an appropriate forensic hospital facility for care and treatment to restore their competency to stand trial. Respondents alternatively petition this court for writs of habeas corpus for their release. We treat the petitions for writ of prohibition as petitions for writ of certiorari. See Art. V, § 4(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Fla. R.App. P. 9.030(b)(3); 9.100(c)(1),(e). We deny all petitions.

The respective trial courts have declared each one of the respondents to be mentally incompetent to proceed to trial on felony charges. Each respondent was committed by the trial judge to DCF for restoration of competency and treatment on a finding that he met the criteria for involuntary commitment under chapter 916, Florida Statutes (2006). DCF has placed each on a forensic waitlist for beds in an adult forensic mental healthcare facility. At the present time, there are between fifty-two and eighty-two persons around the state ahead of these three respondents on the waitlist of approximately 300 persons awaiting beds.

As of September 1, 2006, each of the respondents has been housed in a secure unit on the ninth floor of the Miami-Dade County Jail. As of the date of this opinion, DCF has yet to move them to appropriate facilities to receive the forensic treatment needed to regain competency to stand trial. According to the record, each of the respondents suffers from severe and worsening mental problems. Respondent, Eugene Roman, is a paranoid schizophrenic who has been in and out of hospitals for years. In April 2005, he was arrested and later rearrested for possession of marijuana. He was convicted and sentenced to 364 days in jail. While serving that sentence, Mr. Roman was placed in unit 9C in the Miami-Dade County Jail, and six days later, gouged out his eyes and is now blind. He stated that voices told him to hurt himself. Within months after his release, Mr. Roman was rearrested on charges of sexual battery, aggravated battery and kidnapping, and was confined again to the ninth floor where he slashed his wrists and now remains. He is in what has been termed as an overwhelming depressive state, and hears voices telling him that he should hurt himself. Respondent, Daniel Fontecha, a homeless man, has a history of mental illness and repeatedly has been hospitalized. He was arrested on charges of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, criminal mischief, and resisting an officer without violence. He has been on the ninth floor of the Miami-Dade County Jail for more than eight months where DCF is administering antipsychotic medication. Respondent, Enrique Cordero, was arrested for sexual battery. He is preoccupied with suicide and has auditory hallucinations telling him to kill himself. He has scars on his wrists and arms from various suicide attempts and is in need of psychiatric care. These are but three of many individuals presently languishing on the ninth floor of the Miami-Dade County Jail awaiting services from DCF to restore them to competency to enable them to proceed to trial.

Affidavits of experts attest to deplorable conditions on the ninth floor of the Miami-Dade County Jail. Dr. Joel Dvoskin states that, in his expert opinion, the conditions fall below standards of care for any reasonable mental health practitioner. He further avers that the conditions in unit 9C would likely exacerbate the symptoms of serious mental illness such as the respondents'. He concluded that, the longer a person is confined to 9C, the more treatment would be required to restore him to competency to stand trial.

Each respondent filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the circuit court seeking an order requiring DCF to comply with its statutory duty to accept and place each of them in an appropriate forensic facility or, in the alternative, grant their petitions for habeas corpus. On October 12, 2006, October 17, 2006, and October 24, 2006, the trial judges granted respectively Mr. Roman's, Mr. Cordero's, and Mr. Fontecha's petition for mandamus. Each trial court ordered DCF to comply forthwith with its statutory duty to take physical custody of the respondents and to place each in an appropriate facility for treatment. Lucy Hadi, Secretary of DCF, filed the present Emergency Petition[s] for Writ of Prohibition or Certiorari and Emergency Motion[s] for Stay in each of the cases. We previously granted the motions for stay pending outcome of these proceedings. The proceedings have been conducted on an expedited basis.

The Florida legislature was very specific in drafting the statutes in question. The statutes require DCF to give immediate and appropriate treatment to those ordered incompetent to stand trial due to mental illness:

(1) ADMINISTRATION.—The Department of Children and Family Services is designated the "Mental Health Authority" of Florida. The department and the Agency for Health Care Administration shall exercise executive and administrative supervision over all mental health facilities, programs, and services.

§ 394.457(1), Fla. Stat. (2006)(emphasis added).

Section 916.107, Florida Statutes (2006), states as follows:

(1) RIGHT TO INDIVIDUAL DIGNITY.—

(a) The policy of the state is that the individual dignity of the client shall be respected at all times and upon all occasions, including any occasion when the forensic client is detained, transported, or treated. Clients with mental illness, retardation, or autism and who are charged with committing felonies shall receive appropriate treatment or training. In a criminal case involving a client who has been adjudicated incompetent to proceed or not guilty by reason of insanity, a jail may be an emergency facility for up to fifteen days following the date the department or agency receives a completed copy of the court commitment order containing all documentation required by the applicable Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. . . .

§ 916.107(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2006)(emphasis added).

* * *

(4) QUALITY OF TREATMENT.—

(a) Each forensic client shall receive treatment or training suited to the client's needs, which shall be administered skillfully, safely, and humanely, with full respect for the client's dignity and personal integrity....

§ 916.107(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2006)(emphasis added).

Pursuant to Florida Statutes, DCF shall provide treatment for persons ordered mentally incompetent to stand trial. The requirement falls on DCF as soon as a state court enters an order committing the mentally incompetent person for treatment. Local officials may...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Dcf v. Matthews
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 3, 2007
    ...Assistant Public Defenders, for respondents. Before RAMIREZ, SHEPHERD, and SUAREZ, JJ. PER CURIAM. Petitions denied. See Hadi v. Cordero, 955 So.2d 17 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). This opinion shall take effect immediately notwithstanding the filing of any motions for ...
  • DISABILITIES v. DALLAS
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 21, 2010
    ...are mandatory, and the Agency “has no discretion to comply or not comply with the statutory requirements.” Hadi v. Cordero, 955 So.2d 17, 20 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). Decidedly, there is no provision in Chapter 916 authorizing the Agency to determine whether a defendant has mental retardation or ......
1 books & journal articles
  • Pretrial motions and defenses
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books The Florida Criminal Cases Notebook. Volume 1-2 Volume 1
    • April 30, 2021
    ...the court should sua sponte order a new competency evaluation. Sampson v. State, 88 So. 3d 209 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (See Hadi v. Cordero , 955 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) for the ruling that DCF lacks authority to refuse to take a person found incompetent and held in jail more than 15 days, ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT