Hadley v. Forsee
| Decision Date | 28 March 1907 |
| Citation | Hadley v. Forsee, 203 Mo. 418, 101 S.W. 59 (Mo. 1907) |
| Parties | HADLEY, Atty. Gen., v. FORSEE. |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Buchanan County.
Suit by Herbert S. Hadley, Attorney General, against Zeilda Forsee.From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals.Affirmed.
J. W. Boyd and Brown & Dolman, for appellant.Eastin, Corby & Eastin and Scarritt, Scarritt & Jones, for respondent.
This is a suit in equity by the Attorney General to establish and enforce what is alleged in the petition to be a trust for public charity created by the will of John Corby, deceased, who died in 1870, leaving a large estate, real and personal, and leaving also a widow, but no child or other descendant.It is claimed in the petition that by the will the widow was given a life estate in the whole property, and the remainder was devised in trust for public charity.The will is copied in the petition in full, and the judgment to be pronounced in the case is to be based on the interpretation to be given the will.This will came before this court some years ago for interpretation, and the judgment of the court then was that the will gave the widow a life estate, but made no disposition of the remainder; that is, that, except as to the life estate to the widow, John Corby died intestate.Corby v. Corby, 85 Mo. 371.That suit was between the heirs at law of John Corby on the one side and the widow on the other.There was no party in the case representing the general public claiming that the will created a trust for public charity.After the decision in that case the heirs at law conveyed their interests in the estate to the widow, who thereupon assumed the absolute ownership of the whole property and, as the petition in this case states, sold large parts of the real estate, appropriated the proceeds to her own use, and reinvested part of the same in other real estate, taking the title in her own name.The widow died in 1899, leaving the defendant, her sister, her sole heir at law.The petition in this case, after setting out the will in full, states the plaintiff's theory of its legal effect; that is, that after the life estate to the widow the remainder was given in trust for charity.The defendant filed a general demurrer to the petition.The court sustained the demurrer, and, plaintiff declining to plead further, judgment for defendant was rendered, and the plaintiff appealed.
The decision in Corby v. Corby, above mentioned, was rendered in 1884, nearly 20 years before the filing of this suit.In view of the fact, as the petition informs us, that in those years there have been many sales and transfers of property belonging to the Corby estate, we should be careful to say nothing in this case to impair titles taken on the faith of the decision in that case, unless it becomes necessary in order to protect some interest that was not bound by that decision.What was decided, therefore, in that case, as between the parties to that suit and their privies, we will take as the law in this case, and we will now consider only the question as to whether a trust for charity is created by the will.The will is in these words:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Tumlin v. Troy Bank & Trust Co.
... ... 5 R.C.L. p. 347, § 82; Hadley v. Forsee, supra, 203 Mo. 418, 101 S.W. 59, ... Page 853 ... 14 L.R.A.,N.S., 117. Recurring now to the provisions of this trust, we are ... ...
-
Gossett v. Swinney
...61 Mo. 592; Corby v. Corby (1884) 85 Mo. 371; Board of Trustees v. May (1907) 201 Mo. 360, 99 S. W. 1093; Hadley v. Forsee (1907) 203 Mo. 418, 101 S. W. 59, 14 L. R. A. (N. S.) 49; Jones v. Patterson (1917) 271 Mo. 1, 195 S. W. 1004, L. R. A. 1917F, 660; Robinson v. Crutcher (1919) 277 Mo. ......
-
Boyd v. Frost Nat. Bank
...Mo. 592, 14 S.W. 49. 43 Elizabeth is a part of the common law of Missouri. However, in that state it is held in Hadlee v. Forsee, 203 Mo. 418, 101 S.W. 59, 14 L.R.A.,N.S., 49, and other cases, that it is necessary to definitely name the purpose and class in a charitable In re Estate of Hinc......
-
Bishop v. Broyles
... ... certainty, the will is not void and unenforceable for ... uncertainty. Mott v. Morris, 249 Mo. 150; Hadley ... v. Forsee, 203 Mo. 427; Barkley v. Donnelly, ... 112 Mo. 571; Griffith v. Witten, 252 Mo. 627; 40 ... Cyc. 1469; Dean v. Carroll County, 103 ... ...