Hagan v. Sahara Caterers, Inc., 1
Decision Date | 22 July 1971 |
Docket Number | CA-CIV,No. 1,1 |
Citation | 487 P.2d 9,15 Ariz.App. 163 |
Parties | Francis A. HAGAN, a widow, Appellant, v. SAHARA CATERERS, INC., a corporation, Appellee. 1378. |
Court | Arizona Court of Appeals |
George W. Oglesby, Phoenix, for appellant.
Moore, Romley, Kaplan, Robbins & Green, by Craig R. Kepner, Phoenix, for appellee.
Plaintiff-appellant Francis A. Hagan brought an action in negligence against defendant-appellee Sahara Caterers, Inc., to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff when she slipped and fell at the entrance to Neptune's Table, a restaurant operated by defendant within the city of Phoenix. The slip and fall was caused by a pebble the size of a pea which was located in the immediate area of the entrance to the restaurant. Plaintiff suffered a broken hip as the result of the fall.
The matter came on for jury trial on March 16, 1970. After plaintiff had put on her case and rested, 1 the trial judge granted defendant's motion for a directed verdict, saying:
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment dismissing her case and raises as her sole question on appeal, 'whether the trial court erred in refusing to submit the issue of defendant's negligence to the jury?'
Plaintiff contends that the case should be reversed since the plaintiff's case was directed to defendant's failure to exercise ordinary care in properly maintaining in a reasonably safe condition the entrance-way of Neptune's Table, and not, as stated by the trial judge--defendant's failure to warn plaintiff of a dangerous condition. We believe that the plaintiff misconstrues the trial judge's remarks, and we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The material facts are not in dispute. The plaintiff testified that for ten years prior to the accident she and her late husband had visited Neptune's Table almost every Friday night for supper. On June 9, 1967, the plaintiff and her husband arrived at Neptune's Table between 7:30 and 8:00 p.m. It was dusk and although visibility was not too good, she had no trouble in seeing where she was going. She noticed a number of pebbles (decorator rock), scattered out in front of the doorway entrance to the restaurant. It is evident from our study of plaintiff's testimony that she knew of the pebbles at the defendant's restaurant prior to the day of the accident, and on that day she saw them again and was attempting to avoid them when she stepped on one the size of a 'pea' which caused her to fall. Under such a factual circumstance our Supreme Court has held that the plaintiff cannot recover. In Warfield v. Shell Oil Company, 106 Ariz. 181, 472 P.2d 50 (1970), a business invitee, such as the plaintiff in the case at bar, came upon the premises of a Shell Oil Service Station to have her car serviced. On the same day a trench had been dug to vent the gasoline storage tanks supplying the station. The trench was dug and backfilled on the same day, the day of the accident. The area surrounding the trench was blacktop while the trench had been filled to ground level with sand and gravel. The business invitee saw the trench, saw it was muddy, and was injured when she attempted to cross it. The court said:
102 Ariz. at 269, 428 P.2d at 421 (Emphasis in original.)
(106 Ariz. at 184, 472 P.2d at 53.)
In the case at bar the plaintiff had prior knowledge of the pebbles, testified to them in great detail, and saw them clearly on the day of the accident. Under these...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Flowers v. K-Mart Corp.
...that invitees would fail to appreciate dangers generally known to be inherent in conditions which are obvious. Hagan v. Sahara Caterers, Inc., 15 Ariz.App. 163, 487 P.2d 9 (1971). "Of course, the bare fact that a condition is 'open and obvious' does not necessarily mean that it is not unrea......
-
Brierley v. Anaconda Co.
...find that the obvious condition was unreasonably dangerous under the circumstances. In the more recent case of Hagan v. Sahara Caterers, Inc., 15 Ariz.App. 163, 487 P.2d 9 (1971), Division One of this court again discussed the duty of an occupier of land to a business invitee. The court hel......
-
Wood v. Costco Wholesale Corp.
...be expected to take care of themselves without further precautions on the part of the defendant-hotel.”); Hagan v. Sahara Caterers, Inc., 487 P.2d 9 (Ariz.Ct.App. 1971) (holding that pebbles at the entrance of a store upon which the plaintiff slipped and fell were open and obvious, and not ......
-
Anderson v. Quiktrip Corp.
..."an unreasonably dangerous condition" with a "condition creat[ing] an unreasonable risk of harm," see Hagan v. Sahara Caterers, Inc., 15 Ariz. App. 163, 165-66, 487 P.2d 9, 11-12 (1971), and the phrase is regularly used in this context, see, e.g., Daugherty v. Montgomery Ward, 102 Ariz. 267......