Hahne v. HANZEL

Decision Date24 June 2004
Citation599 S.E.2d 46,358 N.C. 543
PartiesLutze HAHNE v. John F. HANZEL. Willie M. Easterwood and Raymond Monroe v. Daniel Bauguess; Invincashield, Inc.; and John F. Hanzel.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

Douglas Vreeland, Allan R. Gitter, Winston-Salem, for Hahne, Easterwood, and Monroe.

E. Fitzgerald Parnell, III, Rebecca B. Wofford, Charlotte, for Hanzel.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th day of January 2004 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."

To continue reading

Request your trial
47 cases
  • In the Matter of D.D., No. COA06-1411 (N.C. App. 4/17/2007)
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • April 17, 2007
    ...if they are supported by any competent evidence. In re H.W., 163 N.C. App. 438, 443, 594 S.E.2d 211, 213, disc. review denied, 358 N.C. 543, 599 S.E.2d 46 (2004). A finding that is not the subject of a properly briefed assignment of error is also binding. Koufman v. Koufman, 330 N.C. 93, 97......
  • Piraino Bros. Llc v. Atl. Financial Group Inc.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • April 19, 2011
    ...just as it is to any other negligence action. Hahne v. Hanzel, 161 N.C.App. 494, 588 S.E.2d 915 (2003), disc. review denied, 358 N.C. 543, 599 S.E.2d 46 (2004). The definition of contributory negligence is well-established: Every person having the capacity to exercise ordinary care for his ......
  • In re D.J.D.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • July 5, 2005
    ...permanent home within a reasonable period of time; In re H.W., 163 N.C.App. 438, 445, 594 S.E.2d 211, 215, disc. review denied, 358 N.C. 543, 599 S.E.2d 46 (2004) (quoting N.C. Gen.Stat. § 7B-507(b) The trial court relieved DSS of efforts to reunify as of 17 December 1999. After recounting ......
  • In re C.A.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • August 19, 2014
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT