Hairston v. Seidner
| Decision Date | 23 February 2000 |
| Docket Number | No. 99-1728.,99-1728. |
| Citation | 723 NE 2d 575,88 Ohio St.3d 57 |
| Parties | HAIRSTON, APPELLANT, v. SEIDNER, WARDEN, APPELLEE. |
| Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
Clifford Hairston, pro se.
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Laurence R. Snyder, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Hairston did not attach all of his pertinent commitment papers to his habeas corpus petition. R.C. 2725.04(D); State ex rel. Dozier v. Mack (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 368, 369, 708 N.E.2d 712, 713. A court of record speaks only through its journal entries, Gaskins v. Shiplevy (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 380, 382, 667 N.E.2d 1194, 1196, and Hairston failed to attach a sentencing entry from one of his criminal cases.1
Judgment affirmed.
1. We also deny Hairston's January 3, 2000 motion for emergency relief. Hairston is not entitled to an investigation concerning his claim that no docket index of this case was sent to him by the clerk of the court of appeals under S.Ct.Prac.R. V(3), and because of his defective petition, he suffered no prejudice even if his claim had merit.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Pierson
...(Emphasis sic.) State v. Blankenship (Sept. 7, 2001), 11th Dist. No. 2000-P-0097, 2001 WL 1023645. See, also, Hairston v. Seidner (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 57, 58, 723 N.E.2d 575; Gaskins v. (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 380, 382, 667 N.E.2d 1194; State v. Mincy (1982), 2 Ohio St.3d 6, 8, 2 OBR 282, 44......
-
WBCMT 2007-C33 Office 7870, LLC v. Bar J Ranch-Kemper Pointe LLC
...language in terms of the monetary award.Because, "[a] court of record speaks only through its journal entries", Hairston v. Seidner , 88 Ohio St.3d 57, 58, 2000-Ohio-271, 723 N.E.2d 575, the Judgment Entry itself still contains language entering judgment "in an amount not less than the $258......
-
State v. Boles
...but insists that this error can be corrected by a nunc pro tunc entry. {¶ 34} A court speaks through its journal entries. Hairston v. Seidner, 88 Ohio St.3d 57, 2000-Ohio-271. Generally, "trial courts lack authority to reconsider their own valid final judgments in criminal cases." State ex ......
-
State v. Anne C. Pierson
... ... entries.' (Emphasis sic.) State v. Blankenship, ... 11th Dist. No. 2000-P-0097, 2001-Ohio- 4345, at ¶7. See, ... also, Hairston v. Seidner, 88 Ohio St.3d 57, 58, ... 2000-Ohio-271; Gaskins v. Shiplevy, 76 Ohio St.3d ... 380, 382, 1996-Ohio-387; State v. Mincy (1982), 2 ... ...