Hale v. Kroger Ltd. Partnership I
Decision Date | 02 July 2009 |
Docket Number | 2071237. |
Citation | 28 So.3d 772 |
Parties | Shirley P. HALE v. KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I. |
Court | Alabama Court of Civil Appeals |
Patrick O. Miller and Timothy P. Pittman of Dick Riggs Miller LLP, Huntsville, for appellant.
John P. Burbach and Travis S. Jackson of Sirote & Permutt, P.C., Huntsville, for appellee.
On Application for Rehearing.
This court's opinion of March 6, 2009, is withdrawn, and the following is substituted therefor.
Shirley P. Hale appeals from a summary judgment entered by the Madison Circuit Court ("the trial court") in favor of Kroger Limited Partnership I in a slip-and-fall action. We affirm.
On April 6, 2007, Hale sued Kroger, seeking damages for personal injuries he alleged he had received when he slipped and fell on spilled baby food in a store owned and operated by Kroger. Hale claimed that his injuries had resulted from the negligence and/or wantonness of Kroger. Kroger filed an answer denying liability and asserting various affirmative defenses. Kroger ultimately filed a motion for a summary judgment on all counts of the complaint, which the trial court granted on July 30, 2008. Hale appealed that summary judgment to the Alabama Supreme Court on September 10, 2008; that court transferred the appeal to this court on September 30, 2008, pursuant to Ala. Code 1975, § 12-2-7.
On appeal, Hale argues only that the trial court erred in entering the summary judgment on his negligence claim. He waives any claim that the trial court erred in entering the summary judgment on his wantonness claim. In regard to his negligence claim, Hale contends that he presented substantial evidence indicating that Kroger had constructive or actual knowledge of the spill before his fall such that it had a duty to safeguard him and/or that he presented substantial evidence indicating that Kroger was delinquent in not discovering and removing the hazardous condition.
In Sizemore v. Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Ass'n, 671 So.2d 674 (Ala. Civ.App.1995), this court stated:
In reviewing a summary judgment, this court is limited to a consideration of only the evidence submitted to the trial court when it ruled on the motion for a summary judgment. Bean v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 591 So.2d 17, 20 (Ala. 1991). In the present case, that evidence consisted solely of the affidavit of Jason Perry, the manager of the Kroger store on duty at the time of Hale's fall, and the deposition testimony of Hale.
In his affidavit, Perry stated:
Kroger submitted Hale's entire deposition to the trial court. Those portions relevant to the disposition of the summary-judgment motion provide that, on April 9, 2005, Hale, who is 5-foot 7-inches tall and weighed 210 pounds and was 77 years old at the time, visited the Kroger store on Drake Avenue in Huntsville to purchase milk. Hale was wearing what he termed "boat shoes" that he had worn every other day for several years before the accident. The bottom of the shoes were made of rubber and appeared worn and smooth.
According to Hale, he was familiar with the layout of the Kroger store, having shopped there twice a week since 1977. After entering the store on April 9, 2005, Hale went straight down an aisle running parallel to a "square" of four automatic-checkout machines. He stopped at a sales display located at the junction of that aisle with the main cross-aisle of the store. Hale then proceeded to the rear of the store where the coolers were positioned in order to obtain a gallon of milk. Hale then returned to the sales display at the junction of the main cross-aisle and the aisle running next to the four automatic-checkout machines where he picked up a small box containing kitchen items from the sales display. Hale carried those items about 20 or 25 feet to the opening leading into the automatic-checkout area where he intended to serve himself. At that time, two Kroger personnel were in the area—a young female and an approximately 30-year-old male cashier. When he arrived in the area, Hale observed that other patrons were using all four automatic-checkout machines; however, the patron using the last automatic-checkout machine on the left just in front of the cashier appeared to be leaving the area.
As the patron completed her transaction, Hale began walking toward the machine. He was looking up toward the area to which he was walking; he was not looking at the floor. He did not notice any substance on the floor or any cone or other warning of any hazards in the area. No Kroger employee warned him of any spill. When he reached the area around the middle of the entrance to the automatic-checkout area between the first two automatic-checkout machines, Hale slipped and fell to the floor.
While Hale was on the floor, he did not immediately see anything on the floor. He overheard a woman, who he believed to be a customer, say that broken baby-food jars were on the floor. Hale testified that he then observed bright-orange and milky-white baby food laying on the floor in a shallow puddle spreading over an area approximately 18 inches by 15 inches. The puddle appeared to Hale to be fresh, and it had been smeared where Hale had fallen in it. Hale also saw the lid to one jar of baby food, which was still attached to part of the jar, in the middle of the puddle. Hale did not see any broken pieces of the jar.
According to Hale, after the fall, the young female Kroger employee came over, picked up the gallon of milk Hale had dropped during the fall, and offered to assist Hale to his feet. At that time, she informed Hale that "we've called for the mop squad." As Hale was getting up, two young male Kroger employees arrived to clean up the area and to place a cone or warning sign at the site.
Hale testified that he proceeded to checkout. He asked the cashier for paper towels to clean off his leg. He noticed that he had "orange stuff" on the bottom and side of his shoe and also on his right leg, which he assumed was strained carrots. He also discovered a milky-white substance on his right shoe and right leg up to his knee, which he identified as a different type of baby food. That discovery led Hale to conclude that he had slipped in a puddle made by two broken jars of baby food. Hale stated that his right knee had been cut during the fall and that he had bled as well.
Hale testified that he did not know how the puddle of baby food had gotten on the floor. When asked how long the puddle had been there, Hale responded as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Little v. Consol. Publ'g Co.
...obvious meaning considering no one had alleged Little had gained any pecuniary advantage from the audit. See Hale v. Kroger Ltd. P'ship I, 28 So.3d 772, 776 (Ala.Civ.App.2009) (holding that, in ruling on a summary-judgment motion, record evidence must be viewed in a light most favorable to ......
-
Little v. Consol. Publ'g Co.
...obvious meaning considering no one had alleged Little had gained any pecuniary advantage from the audit. See Hale v. Kroger Ltd. P'ship I, 28 So. 3d 772, 776 (Ala. Civ. App. 2009) (holding that, in ruling on a summary-judgment motion, record evidence must be viewed in a light most favorable......
-
Knox v. United States
...inspection procedures are inadequate or were performed inadequately on the day of a plaintiff's fall. See Hale v. Kroger, Ltd. P'ship I, 28 So.3d 772, 783 (Ala.Civ.App.2009). Defendant argues that summary judgment is appropriate because Plaintiff cannot produce any evidence that it had actu......
-
Smith v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA
...its summary-judgment motion that it lacked superior knowledge of the danger presented by the chair. In Hale v. Kroger Limited Partnership I, 28 So.3d 772, 778-79 (Ala. Civ. App. 2009), this court stated, in pertinent part:" ‘A premises owner owes his invitees a duty to keep the premises in ......