Hale v. Shear Express, Inc.
Decision Date | 20 June 2006 |
Docket Number | No. 1D05-3636.,1D05-3636. |
Citation | 932 So.2d 514 |
Parties | Linda Lou HALE, Appellant, v. SHEAR EXPRESS, INC., d/b/a Hair Express, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
David Bromley of The Bleakley Law Firm, Tampa, Susan W. Fox of Fox & Loquasto, Tampa, and Wendy S. Loquasto of Fox & Loquasto, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
David K. Beach, and Elizabeth P. Mulligan of Rissman, Barrett, Hurt, Donahue & McLain, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.
In this workers' compensation case, claimant seeks review of a final order enforcing a settlement agreement. She contends that it is clear from the record that the parties never reached agreement on all essential terms. We agree. See, e.g., Suggs v. Defranco's, Inc., 626 So.2d 1100, 1100-01 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) ( ). Accordingly, we reverse the order enforcing the settlement agreement, and remand with directions that the judge of compensation claims hold the final merits hearing previously requested by claimant.
REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hale v. Shear Express, Inc.
...appellate attorneys, we reverse and remand with directions that the judge award the amount requested. In Hale v. Shear Express, Inc., 932 So.2d 514 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006), we reversed an order of the judge of compensation claims enforcing a settlement agreement. By unpublished order we also gr......