Halfacre v. Paragon Bridge & Steel Co.
Decision Date | 04 December 1962 |
Docket Number | No. 10,10 |
Citation | 368 Mich. 366,118 N.W.2d 455 |
Parties | Daniel HALFACRE, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. PARAGON BRIDGE AND STEEL COMPANY and Michigan Mutual Liability Company, Defendants and Appellants. |
Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
James L. Schueler and Ray R. Ravary, Detroit, for appellants.
Sauer & Girard, Pontiac, Henry A. Compeau, Pontiac, George L. Downing, Detroit, of counsel, for appellee.
Before the Entire Bench.
SOURIS, Justice (for affirmance).
Since 1927 (P.A.1927, No. 162) our workmen's compensation law has provided (first, for injured employees between the ages of 16 and 18 and then, by P.A.1929, No. 113, for those under 18 years of age):
'* * * That any minor under 18 years of age whose employment at the time of injury shall be shown to be illegal shall, in the absence of fraudulent use of permits or certificates of age, in which case only single compensation shall be paid, receive compensation double that provided elsewhere in this act.' C.L.S.1956, § 411.7 (Stat.Ann.1960 Rev. § 17.147).
C.L.1948, § 408.60 (Stat.Ann.1960 Rev. § 17.20), prohibits employment of minors in certain occupations. It also provides for the issuance of permits without which no minor under the age of 18 years legally may be employed in certain occupations and for certificates by which a minor can establish his age conclusively for employment purposes. In 1927, at the time of enactment of the statutory provision quoted above, C.L.1948, § 408.60 (Stat.Ann.1960 Rev. § 17.20) read, as it reads now, in its presently relevant parts as follows:
'Sec. 10. No child nuber [fifteen] 15 years of age shall be employed, permitted or suffered to work in or in connection with any mercantile institution, store, office, hotel, laundry, manufacturing establishment, mine, bowling alley, billiard or pool room conducted for profit, theater, passenger or freight elevator, factory or workshop, quarry, telegraph or messenger service within this state during school hours: Provided, This section shall not apply to any child of the age of [fourteen] 14 years or over, working on Saturdays or other days during the school year, outside of school hours or during the established vacation period in preserving perishable goods in fruit or vegetable canning establishments or in any mercantile institutions, store, office, hotel, laundry, manufacturing establishment, factory or workshop, quarry, telegraph or messenger service within this state * * * '(a) It shall be the duty of every mercantile institution, store, hotel, office, laundry, manufacturing establishment, mine, bowling alley, workshop, quarry, telegraph or messenger service or any person coming within the provisions of this act to keep a register in which will be recorded the name, birthplace, age and place of residence of every person employed under the age of [eighteen] 18 years and it shall be unlawful for any such establishment or person to hire or employ or permit to be hird or employed or suffer to work, any child under the age of [eighteen] 18 years without there is first provided and placed on file in the business office thereof a permit or certificate. Such permit or certificate shall be issued by the superintendent of schools of the school district in which such child resides, or the county commissioner of schools, or some one duly authorized by him in writing, any of whom shall have power to administer oaths in relation thereto. Such permit or certificates shall be returned immediately to the issuing officer by the employer when such child leaves such employment prior to reaching the age of [eighteen] 18 years. A child shall be considered as having withdrawn from his employment when he or she shall have absented himself or herself from work for [five] 5 full working days without explanation. Every limited vacation permit, hereinafter to be described, shall, upon its expiration, be void and of no effect. The said register and permit or certificate shall be produced for inspection on demand of any authorized representative of the commission. No fee shall be charged for such permit or certificate or other record required by this act by any officer by whom it shall be issued. Every employer complying with the provisions of this section shall be at liberty to employ the person so presenting the permit or certificate hereinbefore referred to, and is justified in considering and treating such person as of the age shown in such permit or certificate and shall not be liable, if it transpire that such person is under the age represented in such permit or certificate, to any greater extent than such employer would be liable if such person were of the age represented.
'(b) The person authorized and required to issue such permit or certificate shall not issue the same until he has received, examined, approved and filed the following papers duly executed:
'Second: A passport, or duly attested transcript of the record of birth, as kept by any duly authorized public authority, or a record of baptism or other religious record, showing the date and place of birth of such young person;
'(d) Any person who shall make a false statement, transcript, passport, school certificate, certificate of physical fitness, school record or any other writing required to be made or filed by the provisions of this section shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by a fine of not less than [ten] 10 nor more than [one hundred] 100 dollars or imprisonment for not less than [ten] 10 days nor more than [ninety] 90 days, or by both such fine and imprisonment in the discretion of the court;
'(e) Any child under [seventeen] 17 years of age living or working in a school district maintaining a continuation school under Act No. [four hundred twenty-one] 421 of the public acts of [nineteen hundred nineteen] 1919, as amended, shall be subject to that act.'
The appeal board of the workmen's compensation department (by a 2 to 1 vote) affirmed a referee's award to claimant of double compensation for injuries incurred while illegally employed as a minor, claimant not having made fraudulent use of permits or...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Autio v. Proksch Const. Co., 9
...made by this Court in Hajduk. My views concerning the unsoundness of this doctrine were expressed in Halfacre v. Paragon Bridge & Steel Co. (1962), 368 Mich. 366, 118 N.W.2d 455, and I here reaffirm those views finding them applicable to the errors committed in Hajduk. 5 I would overrule Ha......
-
Mosier v. Carney
...and Dood present a duplicate of what became standoffs if Burns v. Van Laan, 367 Mich. 485, 116 N.W.2d 873 and Halfacre v. Paragon Bridge & Steel Co., 368 Mich. 366, 118 N.W.2d 455. In Halfacre a 35 year old statute was found by five of us as having been construed and applied by the court on......
-
Rowland v. Washtenaw County Road Com'n
...entirely without predictability. This is a prescription for chaos and injustice. 12. See, also, Halfacre v. Paragon Bridge & Steel Co., 368 Mich. 366, 377, 118 N.W.2d 455 (1962) (Courts have the "right and duty to re-examine and re-examine again, if need be, statutory enactments already jud......
-
Howard v. City of Detroit
...employed here, of breaking a four-four deadlock, is the same as was employed by the writer in the Halfacre Case [Halfacre v. Paragon Bridge & Steel Co.], 368 Mich. 366, 389, 118 N.W.2d 455). DETHMERS, I am in full accord with the concluding paragraph in the main portion of Mr. Justice Black......