Hall v. First Nat. Bank of Atlanta

• Decision Date: 17 October 1952
• Docket Number: 34164,Nos. 1,Nos. 34163,2,s. 34163,s. 1
• Citation: 87 Ga.App. 142,73 S.E.2d 252
• Parties: HALL v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF ATLANTA. FIRST NAT. BANK OF ATLANTA v. HALL
• Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Page 252

73 S.E.2d 252

87 Ga.App. 142

HALL v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF ATLANTA.

FIRST NAT. BANK OF ATLANTA v. HALL.

Nos. 34163, 34164.

Court of Appeals of Georgia, Division Nos. 1, 2.

Oct. 17, 1952.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 8, 1952.

Syllabus by the Court.

1. Courts of record retain full control over their orders and judgments during the term at which they are rendered, and in the exercise of a sound discretion may revise or vacate them, as the ends of justice may require, and such discretion, unless manifestly abused, will not be controlled by courts of review. This inherent power of the court extends to all orders and judgments, except those founded on jury verdicts.

2. The court of ordinary is a court of record, and its judgments are subject to this same rule and may be set aside during the term when entered, in the sound discretion of the ordinary.

3. Under the facts of this case and the law applicable thereto, it was not an abuse of discretion on the part of the judge of the superior court, on the appeal from the court of ordinary, to vacate and set aside the judgment allowing a year's support.

(a) The court of ordinary had plenary control over the judgment setting apart the year's support during the term at which it was entered and, in the exercise of a sound discretion could vacate such judgment as the ends of justice might require, and the judge of the superior court, on the appeal, was invested with the same authority.

4. Accordingly, the trial judge did not err in overruling the plaintiff in error's motion to strike and the general demurrer to the executor's petition to set aside the judgment allowing a year's support, and in vacating and setting aside such judgment.

Lucian J. Endicott, Atlanta, for plaintiff in error.

Robert B. Troutman, James M. Sibley, W. K. Meadow, Atlanta, for defendant in error.

SUTTON, Chief Judge.

Courts of record retain full control over their orders and judgments during the term at which they are rendered, and in the exercise of a sound discretion may revise or vacate them, as the ends of justice may require, and such discretion, unless manifestly abused, will not be controlled by courts of review. This inherent power of the court extends to all orders and judgments, except those founded on jury verdicts. It has been said that such orders and judgments remain in the breast of the court during the term when granted. The above-stated principle of law, as to the plenary control of a court of record over its own judgments during the term when made, has been ruled many times by the Supreme Court and this court. For some of the cases so holding, see: Grogan v. Deraney, 38 Ga.App. 287, 290(4), 143 S.E. 912; Methodist Episcopal Church South, Inc. v. Decell, 60 Ga.App. 843, 849, 5 S.E.2d 66; Allison v. Garber, 50 Ga.App. 333, 335(1), 178 S.E. 158; Whitlock v. Wilson, 79 Ga.App. 747, 54 S.E.2d 474; Bowen v. Wyeth, 119 Ga. 687, 46 S.E. 823; Gaines v. Gaines, 169 Ga. 432, 434, 150 S.E. 645; Cahoon v. Wills, 179 Ga. 195, 196, 175 S.E. 563; East Side Lumber & Coal Co. v. Barfield, 193 Ga. 273, 276, 18 S.E.2d 492; Cofer v. Maxwell, 201 Ga. 846, 848, 41 S.E.2d 420; Shivers v. Shivers, 206 Ga. 552, 57 S.E.2d 660; Tyler v. Eubanks, 207 Ga. 46, 50, 60 S.E.2d 130.

The court of ordinary is a court of record, and its judgments are subject to this same principle ruled in the above cases and may be set aside during the term when entered, in the sound discretion of the ordinary. Mobley v. Mobley, 9 Ga. 247.

It appears from the record in this case that the plaintiff in error, Mrs. Nellie Goins Hall, and James Oscar Hall intermarried in April, 1916, and that they separated on January 2, 1940; and, on September 30, 1940, while living in a bona fide state of separation, they entered into a contract by the terms of which J. O. Hall, with cash and property, settled in full with Mrs. Hall for both temporary and permanent alimony. These parties continued to live in a state of separation until the death of J. O. Hall in 1950. In May, 1951, Mrs. Hall filed her application in the court of ordinary for a year's support, and alleged in this application that she was the widow of James Oscar Hall, and that under the laws of Georgia she was entitled to a year's support out of his estate. Three of the five appraisers appointed on this application made their return setting apart to Mrs. Hall a year's support in the sum of $26,000. One of the appraisers was a non-resident of Fulton County, but he did not act. The return of the appraisers was ordered to record and made the judgment of the court of ordinary on June 4, 1951.

First National Bank of Atlanta, as executor of the will of J. O. Hall, filed a petition in the court of ordinary, at the June, 1951, term to set aside and vacate its judgment of June 4, 1951, allowing a year's support to Mrs. Hall, and alleged substantially: that Mrs. Hall had filed her petition for a year's support in which she alleged that the value of the estate of J. O. Hall was $32,795.04; that five appraisers were appointed on her application, three of whom made a return setting aside to Mrs. Hall a year's support in the sum of $26,000; that the court of ordinary, on June 4, 1951, had entered an order allowing the year's support which had been set apart by the appraisers; that, since the entry of said judgment, the executor had learned that one of the appraisers appointed (naming him) was a resident of DeKalb County; that the year's support was improvidently granted; that the return setting aside $26,000, or more than five-sixths of the entire estate, was grossly excessive in the light of the circumstances and standing of the widow at the time of the death of J. O. Hall and should not be allowed to stand; and that the order allowing the year's support, dated June 4, 1951, is still in the breast of the court and the court has the power, in its discretion, to set the same aside.

This petition to set aside was amended at the said June term of the court of ordinary by alleging that, on September 30, 1940, J. O. Hall and Mrs. Hall entered into a certain contract in which Mrs. Hall accepted certain payments made to her as a complete settlement of temporary and permanent alimony, and that, on November 20, 1940, the said Mrs. Hall acknowledged full compliance with said contract; that said court entered its order on June 4, 1951, upon the representation of Mrs. Hall that she was entitled to an award of a year's support, whereas she was barred from said award by virtue of said contract in settlement of alimony; and that said allegation that Mrs. Hall was entitled to a year's support was a false allegation and was made to the court of ordinary for the purpose of inducing that court to grant her a year's support.

Mrs. Hall filed a motion to dismiss the petition or motion of the executor to set aside the judgment of June 4, 1951, on the grounds that the executor was not an interested party; that its duty as executor was to administer the estate; that it was properly notified of the application for a year's support but filed no objection to said application; and that the executor is now precluded from attacking the judgment rendered therein. She also filed a general demurrer to the motion to set aside on the ground that it set forth no cause of action. Both the motion to dismiss and the general demurrer were overruled.

The executor filed a caveat to the return of the appraisers on June 28, 1951, on the grounds: (1) that one of the appraisers appointed was not a resident of Fulton County; (2) that the award made in such return was excessive; and (3) that Mrs. Hall and J. O. Hall had entered into a written contract, dated September 30, 1940, whereby in consideration of the receipt by her of certain properties, said Mrs. Hall had settled all her rights to temporary and permanent alimony, as against J. O. Hall, and, as a result of said contract, said Mrs. Hall has no right to a year's support out of the property left by J. O. Hall. No objection was made to the caveat, and it was ordered filed on June 28, 1951.

The judge of the court of ordinary, on June 28, 1951, during the June term of his court, passed the following order, revoking and vacating his judgment of June 4, 1951: 'Believing it to be in the interest of justice and also believing that good cause exists, it is hereby ordered that the order and judgment of this court dated June 4, 1951, ordering and recording the return of the appraisers setting apart the twelve months' support to Mrs. Nellie Goins Hall be and the same is hereby revoked and vacated.'

Mrs. Hall appealed to the superior court and then to the Court of Appeals, and the case was returned by this court to the superior court for further consideration. Hall v. First National Bank of Atlanta, 85 Ga.App. 498, 69 S.E.2d 679. On April 24, 1952, the executor tendered another amendment to his motion to set aside, which last amendment was disallowed on objection interposed thereto by Mrs. Hall, on April 25, 1952. Mrs. Hall then renewed her motion to strike the executor's amended petition to vacate and set aside the judgment allowing the year's support, and also renewed her general demurrer to said petition. This motion and the demurrer were both overruled. The judge of the superior court then rendered the following judgment: 'The petition of First National Bank as executor of the estate of James Oscar Hall deceased to revoke and set aside the order of the Ordinary of Fulton County, Georgia, recording the return of the appraisers [setting apart a year's support to] Mrs. Nellie Goins Hall, which...