Hall v. Robinson

Decision Date31 December 1857
Citation3 Jones 348,56 N.C. 348
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesANNE C. HALL, Trustee, and others, v. THOMAS ROBINSON, receiver, and another.
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Where a general right of disposition is given to the taker of an estate, a contingent limitation in remainder is inoperative and void but a limitation to one, and if he should die before arriving at full age, or if he should arrive at full age and afterwards die intestate and without issue, then to A, B, and C in remainder, was Held not to give a general right of disposition, but that the limitation over was valid.

In a conditional limitation of an estate, if the person to take is certain, his representative is entitled to the interest limited to him, although he died before the happening of the event on which the estate in remainder was to vest in possession.

As a general rule, dividends on bank stock, and interest arising from money, become the absolute property of the taker of the life-estate, and a contrary intention will not be inferred from the use of words not necessary to the sense of the bequest in which they were used, but in that connection were considered as surplusage.

CAUSE removed from the Court of Equity of Anson county.

Mrs. Rosa A. Troy, by her will bequeathed in the first clause thereof as follows:

“I give and bequeath to my grand-son Thomas Lance, twenty shares of stock in the Bank of the State of North Carolina; also twenty shares of stock in the Bank of Cape-Fear; also four notes at interest in South Carolina, amounting in the whole to three thousand three hundred dollars; also four hundred and thirty-five dollars at interest in North Carolina; also my negro boy named James (son of Molly); to him the said Thomas Lance and his heirs forever; with all increase and profits arising therefrom. Should my grand-son die before he arrives at the age of twenty-one, or should he die intestate after that age, leaving no issue, then, and in that case, it is my will that the above property bequeathed to him, shall be equally divided among the children of my daughter Anne Caroline Hall, in manner following: to Robert Troy Hall and Thomas C. Hall, their parts absolutely; but the three parts or portions of Mary W. Hall, Rosanna Hall and Harriet Elenor Hall, I give and bequeath to my sister Harriet H. Strong, her executors and administrators, in trust, for the use and benefit of said Mary W. Hall, Rosanna Hall and Harriet Elenor Hall, respectively.”

In the sixth clause of the will, the testatrix directs that certain tracts of land, town lots and slaves shall be sold by her executrix, and then provides as follows: “The money arising from these several sales, I wish divided into six equal parts, or portions, for my six grand-children, viz: one portion for Thomas Lance, one for Robert T. Hall, one for Thomas C. Hall, one portion or sixth part for Mary W. Hall, one for Rosanna Hall, and one for Harriet Elenor Hall respectively--the three girls' parts to be held in trust, for their use and benefit, by my sister Harriet H. Strong, to whom I give and bequeath it for that purpose; should Thomas Lance die while a minor, or after coming to the age of twenty-one, leaving no will nor issues, then his sixth part shall be divided among my other five grand-children.”

After having qualified as executrix, and having proceeded to some extent in discharging the duties of that office, and as special trustee for Mary W. Hall and her sisters, Mrs. Strong, upon an application to the Court of Equity of Anson county, was released from the trust aforesaid, and Anne C. Hall, the mother of the said Mary, Rosanna and Harriet Elenor, was appointed trustee in her place. Thomas Lance, the legatee, being a person of weak mind and incapable of managing his affairs, upon a like application to the Court of Equity aforesaid, the defendant Thomas Robinson was appointed a receiver for and in behalf of the said Thomas, to whom Mrs. Strong, the executrix, paid over the whole of the legacies coming to the said Thomas under the above bequests.

Thomas Lance died in 1857, after having arrived at full age, but without leaving any issue, and without having made a will, and the bill is filed by the contingent legatees in remainder against the receiver and against the personal representative of the said Thomas, praying that the said fund, with its increase and accumulations from dividends, interest on money and profits, shall be paid to them.

During the life of Thomas Lance, one of these contingent legatees, Harriet Elenor Hall, intermarried with ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Finlayson v. CABARRUS BANK & TRUST COMPANY
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of North Carolina
    • March 4, 1960
    ...Gregory v. Beasley, 36 N.C. 25; Spruill v. Moore, 40 N.C. 284; Jones v. Simmons, 42 N.C. 178; Braswell v. Morehead, 45 N.C. 26; Hall v. Robinson, 56 N.C. 348; Williams v. Cotten, 56 N.C. 395; Baker v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., supra 173 N.C. 365, 92 S.E. 170, L.R.A.1917E, 266; Ernul v. Er......
  • Woodard v. Clark
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • September 24, 1952
    ...Gregory v. Beasley, 36 N.C. 25; Spruill v. Moore, 40 N.C. 284; Jones v. Simmons, 42 N.C. 178; Braswell v. Morehead, 45 N.C. 26; Hall v. Robinson, 56 N.C. 348; Williams v. Cotten, 56 N.C. 395; Baker v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., supra; Ernul v. Ernul, 191 N.C. 347, 132 S.E. When such future......
  • Daniel v. Bass
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • March 2, 1927
    ...to the estate in fee, and void." Roane v. Robinson, 189 N.C. 628, 127 S.E. 626; Carroll v. Herring, 180 N.C. 369, 104 S.E. 892; Hall v. Robinson, 56 N.C. 348. trial court erred, however, in adjudging that Mahala Daniel is the owner in fee of all the property and estate of which Isaac and Na......
  • Roane v. Robinson
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • May 6, 1925
    ... ... property is given to the taker of the first fee, such right ... is inconsistent with the second fee, and the consequence is ... that the limitation over of the second fee is inoperative and ... void. Newland v. Newland, 46 N.C. 463; Hall v ... Robinson, 56 N.C. 348. In McDaniel v. McDaniel, ... 58 N.C. 351, Chief Justice Pearson employed this language: ...          "If ... one devises in fee simple, he cannot make a limitation over ... by way of executory devise without cutting down the first ... fee, in order to ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT